2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2005.02342.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomarkers for the effects of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) in healthy subjects

Abstract: AimsStudies of novel centrally acting drugs in healthy volunteers are traditionally concerned with kinetics and tolerability, but useful information may also be obtained from biomarkers of clinical endpoints. This paper provides a systematic overview of CNStests used with SSRIs in healthy subjects. A useful biomarker should meet the following requirements: a consistent response across studies and drugs; a clear response of the biomarker to a therapeutic dose; a dose-response relationship; a plausible relations… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
97
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
1
97
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on previous reviews [7][8][9][10][11], it was anticipated that in most cases no consistent quantitative results could be obtained from individual tests, because of the large diversity of methods, parameters and treatments.Therefore, the ability of a test to detect a statistically significant difference from placebo or baseline was scored as '+' (improvement/ increase), '=' (no significant effect) or '-' (impairment/ decrease). Subjective assessments of effects that were signs of improved CNS function or that most users would consider pleasurable (e.g.…”
Section: Individual Test Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on previous reviews [7][8][9][10][11], it was anticipated that in most cases no consistent quantitative results could be obtained from individual tests, because of the large diversity of methods, parameters and treatments.Therefore, the ability of a test to detect a statistically significant difference from placebo or baseline was scored as '+' (improvement/ increase), '=' (no significant effect) or '-' (impairment/ decrease). Subjective assessments of effects that were signs of improved CNS function or that most users would consider pleasurable (e.g.…”
Section: Individual Test Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ability to show clear dose-response relationships is an important requirement for a meaningful drug-effect biomarker [7][8][9][10][11]. The dose also determines the sensitivity of a test for a drug, and the chance to detect an effect.…”
Section: Dose-response Relationshipsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in samples of healthy control subjects, alterations in serotonergic, 22 dopaminergic, 23 and cholinergic 24 function were associated with changes in theta function and neurocognition. These studies suggest an approach for determining the specific neurochemical changes that underlie theta and neurocognitive abnormalities in methamphetamine users.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Or is this one of the 10%-24% of the ADHD population who has unexpected epileptiform or paroxysmal EEG activity who will respond to anticonvulsant medication, and if so, which one? For some cases of ADHD, there is even a chance a client will respond to the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) class of drugs including Prozac and Zoloft (Dumont, de Visser, Cohen, & van Gerven, 2005) or to the serotonin and norepinephrine (SNRI) drugs such as Effexor or its newer isomer Pristiq. Occasionally, lithium may be provided for hyperkinetic behavior, as though it were related to bipolar disorder.…”
Section: Historically Eeg Has Been Used To Predict Medication Efficacymentioning
confidence: 99%