Biomass and standing stock on sublittoral hard substrates in the Oosterschelde estuary (SW Netherlands)

Abstract

From 1979 to 1991 the species composition of communities living on hard substrata (hardsub) in the Oosterschelde has been studied -in both the littoral and sublittoral zones . From 1984 onwards, biomass was also measured . This paper deals mainly with the distribution and the development of biomass on sublittoral hardsub in the Oosterschelde . Analysis has shown that the most important abiotic factors regulating the flora and fauna are : quantity and nature of the substrate ; sedimentation ; exposure to water movement (mainly currents) ; and light . The construction of the storm-surge barrier has influenced those factors . The main consequences for the flora and fauna on sublittoral hard substrata have been through the increased amount of available hard substratum by about 10 % until 1984 and a further 20% from 1984 to 1987, the main barrier construction period) . Within the same period (until 1987) the biomass per square metre also increased . This caused a net increase of hardsub biomass -in the sublittoral -of about 35 % .After the barrier was completed sedimentation increased ; in some parts of the basin hardsub organisms were covered by sediment and have not recovered ; the total quantity of available hard substratum decreased by an amount yet to be established . For the purpose of this paper it is tentatively estimated at 20%,, but the process is still going on .Tidal current velocities are smaller in the post-barrier situation, which caused a shift from more passive suspension feeders to more actively filtering species . The relative importance of suspension feeders on hard substrata has decreased by about 20% after the building of the storm-surge barrier . In 1990 and 1991 it increased again .Overall water transparency increased, but the lower limit of macroalgal growth has not gone deeper, as nearshore turbulence and turbidity did not change significantly .Effects on hardsub were small in the beginning . During the construction period (1985)(1986)(1987) no clear effects were registered . After the completion of the barrier total species diversity increased at first, followed by a decrease from the second half of 1988 onwards . Biomass increased rather sharply, at first, but decreased very sharply in 1989 . In 1990 a recovery in biomass became apparent . Developments in biomass and species composition differed per sampling location . An attempt is made to explain some of those developments, in relation to the abiotic changes brought about by the storm-surge barrier . This appeared difficult, because climatic influences obscured the effects of the barrier . The most explicit of those masking effects was brought about by a temporary, huge increase of the brittlestar (Ophiothrix 397 398 fragilis). This animal covered the substratum in relatively thick layers (up to 5 cm) and more or less suffocated the other fauna . It was therefore difficult to quantify the effect of increased sedimentation on the fauna. The increase of Ophiothrix is probably not caused by the storm-surge barrier, but by a succession of sev...

Changes in the sublittoral hard substrate communities in the Oosterschelde estuary (SW Netherlands), caused by changes in the environmental parameters

“…This is also found in the total biomass (Leewis et al ., 1994) . As already stated, three executive parameters were responsible for these changes : 1) the decrease of the vertical extinction coefficient, which enabled some algae to penetrate into the aphotic zone; 2) the decrease of tidal current velocities, which enabled other species, not adapted to extreme conditions, to settle in the mouth of the estuary, the Hammen and the Zijpe ; 3) the increase of sedimentation, which prevented settlement and survival of species in certain regions .…”

Introduced Pacific oysters (Crassostrea gigas) in the northern Wadden Sea: invasion accelerated by warm summers?

“…In the Oosterschelde (The Netherlands), where Pacific oysters were introduced in the 1960s, C. gigas is now a dominant species in intertidal and subtidal benthic communities (de Kluijver and Leewis 1994;Leewis et al 1994;Meijer and Waardenburg 1994;Drinkwaard 1999). In British Columbia, C. gigas is found only in intertidal habitats, presumably because low temperatures in deeper waters limit the survival of larvae and juveniles (Quayle 1988).…”

Colonization of an artificial hard substrate byMytilus edulisin the German Bight

“…Okamura 1986;Enderlein & Wahl 2004). In the North Sea the blue mussel Mytilus edulis Linnaeus, 1758 is one of the dominant species in the upper sections of hard substrates (Hardy 1981;Garcia 1991;Leewis et al 1994) including offshore sites (Wolfson et al 1979;Forteath et al 1982;Page & Hubbard 1987;Whomersley & Picken 2003;Buck 2007).…”