2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2006.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomass co-firing in a pressurized fluidized bed combustion (PFBC) combined cycle power plant: A techno-environmental assessment based on computational simulations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
22
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
3
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Jensen reported that the injection of NH 3 into the system leads to 50-60% reduction in NO x [14,15]. Coal along with biomass and other wastes such as straws, switch grass and willow chips can be used as a fuel which is further used for running a combined cycle [19]. Circulating fluidized bed combustion boiler (CFBC) is the system in which steam is produced after burning of fossil fuels in furnace which operates under special hydrodynamic condition known as Fast bed.…”
Section: Boiler (Afbc) Pressurized Fluidized Bed Combustion Boiler (mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jensen reported that the injection of NH 3 into the system leads to 50-60% reduction in NO x [14,15]. Coal along with biomass and other wastes such as straws, switch grass and willow chips can be used as a fuel which is further used for running a combined cycle [19]. Circulating fluidized bed combustion boiler (CFBC) is the system in which steam is produced after burning of fossil fuels in furnace which operates under special hydrodynamic condition known as Fast bed.…”
Section: Boiler (Afbc) Pressurized Fluidized Bed Combustion Boiler (mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By analyzing the literature [11][12][13]15] we can see that are, in particular, three main solutions for the thermal options: o incineration in dedicated plant: this is the solution today more widespread in the North of Europe, on the medium realization scale; o incineration with MSW: generally sludge-MSW rate is 1:5, 1:10, and the combustion are developed in conventional grate system; o incineration in cement kiln or in other energetic production plant. By analyzing the information present in literature [8] we can see that the technology today more promising for the wastewater sludge treatment is the technology of thermal treatment and in particular direct combustion in fluidizing bed at atmospheric pressure.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Otherwise, co-firing basically did not affect the temperature distribution in the furnace, so co-firing had no effect on thermal-NO x . When considering the effect of higher levels of volatile hydrocarbons and the lower heat value of agro/forestry residues which can reduce NO x generation [18,19], and higher levels of alkali metals which can capture SO 2 [32], co-firing can theoretically decrease NO x and SO 2 emissions. With the co-firing ratio used here (7.2 t/h, 5.2 wt%, 3.2 cal%), and assuming 5000 h of annual operating time, it can replace 2.2 × 10 4 tons of coal and reduce CO 2 7.9 × 10 4 tons, so agro/forestry residues possess higher environmental benefits.…”
Section: Environmental Feedbackmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, the HCl generated by the sulphatization of KCl can be trapped by CaO quickly [17]. High concentration of volatile hydrocarbons from agro/forestry residues can react with NO x [18,19], thus, co-firing favors low NO x and SO 2 emissions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%