2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2013.09.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomass torrefaction technology: Techno-economic status and future prospects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
204
0
5

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 280 publications
(213 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
4
204
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The economy of scale, on a series of different torrefaction plant sizes using the common scaling factor of 0.7, is shown in Table 5 (Batidzirai et al 2013). It is important to note that the changes in the operation cost by increasing the plant size are not all linear.…”
Section: Fig 4 Torrefaction Cost Components By Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The economy of scale, on a series of different torrefaction plant sizes using the common scaling factor of 0.7, is shown in Table 5 (Batidzirai et al 2013). It is important to note that the changes in the operation cost by increasing the plant size are not all linear.…”
Section: Fig 4 Torrefaction Cost Components By Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The moisture content of torrefied material used in furnaces (7 to 8%) can be lower than that of standard pellets and briquettes (8 to 10%). During thermal treatment, the biomass loses more hemicellulose than cellulose and lignin (Batidzirai et al 2013). Subsequently, the calorific value of the torrefied pellets increases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is expected that most of the pellets will be converted in the integrated/CHP plant for burning, as this process has been successfully commercialized. Batidzirai et al (2013) estimated that the cost of pellet production would range from 2.8 to 4.2 € /GJ. In the UE, pellet production is estimated to cost 2.72 €/kg.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Torrefied biomass exhibits an improvement in energy density and grindability. In comparison with raw biomass, which has an energy density of 10 to 11 GJ/m 3 , the energy content of the torrefied biomass is approximately 18 to 20 GJ/m 3 , with the potential to reduce transportation costs by 40% to 50% (Chiang et al 2012;Batidzirai et al 2013;Nunes et al 2014). Torrefied biomass can be pulverized with a coal grinder, which lowers the handling cost when co-processing with coal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%