2016
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.35914
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomaterial microarchitecture: a potent regulator of individual cell behavior and multicellular organization

Abstract: Insoluble cues from a cell's surrounding microenvironment have increasingly been shown to be important regulators of cell behavior. The microarchitecture of biomaterials used for 3D cell encapsulation, however, is often underappreciated as an important insoluble factor guiding cell activity. In this review, we illustrate that the subcellular physical features of a scaffold influence a range of cell behaviors, including morphology, cytoskeletal organization, migration, matrix remodeling, and long-range force tr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
55
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 188 publications
(441 reference statements)
1
55
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The phenotype of the CP5 chondrocytes on the PLA scaffolds shown by SEM is rather not typical for the native morphology in cartilage extracellular matrix. But the morphology of cells cultured under experimental conditions is in accordance with the results of previously published studies focused on proliferation of cartilage cells on fibrous scaffolds (Hogrebe et al, 2017;McCullen et al, 2012;Pilarek et al, 2014). Such phenotype differences were probably caused by two factors.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The phenotype of the CP5 chondrocytes on the PLA scaffolds shown by SEM is rather not typical for the native morphology in cartilage extracellular matrix. But the morphology of cells cultured under experimental conditions is in accordance with the results of previously published studies focused on proliferation of cartilage cells on fibrous scaffolds (Hogrebe et al, 2017;McCullen et al, 2012;Pilarek et al, 2014). Such phenotype differences were probably caused by two factors.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Cell culture matrix is made of porous polymers or gels. Selection of a matrix in where cells are embedded is important in 3D culture, and the research and development in cell culture matrix have steadily progressed (Sachlos and Czernuszka 2003;Hoqrebe et al 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Elucidating the mechanisms that control how cells sense and respond to biomaterials surfaces has been the focus of a large body of literature in the past three decades. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7] Results from these studies have unequivocally established that physicochemical properties such as roughness, topography, surface chemistry, energy and stiffness, direct cell fate by affecting key phenomena including adhesion, proliferation, differentiation, gene and protein expression. [8][9][10][11] Among the factors known to control cellular events, nano-topographical features play a pivotal role by exerting direct cueing on adherent cells.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%