The failure mechanisms of acetabular prostheses may be investigated by understanding the changes in load transfer due to implantation, and analysis of the implant-bone micromotion. Computational finite element (FE) models allow detailed mechanical analysis of the implant-bone structure, but their validity must be assessed as part of a verification process before they can be employed in pre-clinical investigations. To this end, in the present study, FE models of composite hemi-pelvises, intact and implanted with an acetabular cup, were experimentally verified. Strains and implant-bone micromotions in the hemi-pelvises were compared with those predicted by the equivalent FE models. Regression analysis indicated close agreement between the measured and FE strains, with a high correlation coefficient (0.95-0.98), a low standard error of the estimate (36-53µε) and a low error in regression slope (7-11%). Measured micromotions along three orthogonal directions were small, less than 30µm, whereas the FE predicted values were found to be less than 85µm. Although the trends were similar, the observed deviations may be due to estimation of the interfacial press-fit used in the FE model, and additional artefacts in experimental micromotion measurement which are avoided in the FE model. This supports the FE model as a valid predictor of the experimentally measured strain in the composite pelvis models, confirming its suitability for further computational investigations on acetabular prostheses. 4
IntroductionLoosening of the acetabular prosthesis is responsible for the majority of failures in total hip replacement [1][2][3][4]. However, biomechanical investigations into phenomena such as the load transfer mechanism across the pelvis and the acetabular reconstruction remain relatively under-investigated as compared to the femoral component. Measurement of such phenomena across the intact and implanted bones would be a useful step forward in the analysis of acetabular failure, and to date this has commonly been evaluated using finite element (FE) analysis [5][6][7][8][9][10][11]. The validity of the FE model generation process should be assessed using quantitative comparisons between computational predictions and experimental results [Anderson et al., 2007].Researchers have investigated the strain/stress distributions in the intact pelvis by comparing experimentally measured strains with those predicted by the equivalent FE model [5,7,10]. However, all these studies featured large areas of rigid fixation, which may not be fully representative of in-vivo bone support. Moreover, there is a scarcity of experimental data on strain measurement in intact and implanted pelvises which could be used to identify potential links between changes in strain distribution due to implantation and clinical failure mechanisms [12][13][14].The initial fixation of an uncemented implant is dependent on the primary stability, which is usually indicated by the amount of micromotion at the implant-bone interface, prior to bone-ingrowth, induc...