2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.12.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomechanical analysis of the timed up-and-go (TUG) test in children with and without Down syndrome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
14
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This study also made use of the timed-up-and-go test, as well as the five-times-sit-to-stand test, to measure balance. Both these tests have been found to be reliable and valid with the measurement of balance in children with disabilities, as well as measuring balance in typically developing children (Beerse, Lelko & Wu 2019 ; Kumban et al 2013 ). The data collected from the outcome measures were recorded at baseline, as well as at the end of the training programme at 8 weeks.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study also made use of the timed-up-and-go test, as well as the five-times-sit-to-stand test, to measure balance. Both these tests have been found to be reliable and valid with the measurement of balance in children with disabilities, as well as measuring balance in typically developing children (Beerse, Lelko & Wu 2019 ; Kumban et al 2013 ). The data collected from the outcome measures were recorded at baseline, as well as at the end of the training programme at 8 weeks.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To perform the TUG test, the participants were asked to sit on an adjusted chair with 90˚knee flexion. This test involved rising from an armchair, walking 3 m at a usual speed, turning around, walking back to the chair, and sitting down [20][21][22]45,46]. These instructions were clearly communicated to participants.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The physiological cost index of gait has been widely used to assessment gait efficiency in healthy children [17]. A previous study reported that the FTSST and TUG are feasible and reliable tools for both children exhibiting typical development and those with disabilities [18][19][20][21][22]. The OLST has been proposed as a fundamental indicator of balance function in children [23,24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of stationary systems to measure gait function, such as the GAITRite system or 3D camera-based systems, have been shown to be quite effective, and previous work using these approaches have also reported efficacy in quantifying gait in many research and rehabilitation settings [1,10,11,12,13,14,15,16]. These approaches have also been used to evaluate gait in healthy controls, with similar values in gait measurements observed to that in the present study [1,10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%