2011
DOI: 10.21236/ada548773
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomechanical and Physiological Validation of the Omni-Directional Treadmill Upgrade as a Mobility Platform for Immersive Environments

Abstract: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.ii REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including sugges… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 1 shows a person walking on the ODT in the IES. A validation study was conducted to compare walking on the ODT with walking over ground for selected biomechanical and physiological variables and to quantify any significant differences (Boynton, Kehring, & White, 2011). Motion capture, gait analysis, and cardiopulmonary measurement techniques were employed to obtain objective measures of temporal-spatial gait parameters, sagittal plane joint kinematics, and metabolic cost for 10 participants walking at two speeds (1.12 m/s and 1.34 m/s) along a circular course (4.3-m radius) over ground and in the IES along an identical circular course in the simulated environment.…”
Section: Instrumentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 1 shows a person walking on the ODT in the IES. A validation study was conducted to compare walking on the ODT with walking over ground for selected biomechanical and physiological variables and to quantify any significant differences (Boynton, Kehring, & White, 2011). Motion capture, gait analysis, and cardiopulmonary measurement techniques were employed to obtain objective measures of temporal-spatial gait parameters, sagittal plane joint kinematics, and metabolic cost for 10 participants walking at two speeds (1.12 m/s and 1.34 m/s) along a circular course (4.3-m radius) over ground and in the IES along an identical circular course in the simulated environment.…”
Section: Instrumentationmentioning
confidence: 99%