2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2021.105475
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomechanical assessment of two types and two different locations of subtalar arthroereisis implants for flexible flatfoot: A cadaveric study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Biomechanical experiments have demonstrated the effectiveness of the subtalar arthroereisis screw in reducing subluxation between the talus and calcaneus during weight-bearing. Its design aligns with the orientation of the sinus tarsi, enabling even distribution of axial stress across the anterior and posterior aspects of the sinus tarsi, which are the anterior and posterior joint surfaces of the subtalar joint ( 15 ). Consequently, the subtalar arthroereisis screw restores the normal motion axis of the subtalar joint, corrects the force line of the hindfoot, restores the foot arch, eliminates excessive valgus, and significantly reduces the mechanical load on the posterior tibial tendon insertion point.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Biomechanical experiments have demonstrated the effectiveness of the subtalar arthroereisis screw in reducing subluxation between the talus and calcaneus during weight-bearing. Its design aligns with the orientation of the sinus tarsi, enabling even distribution of axial stress across the anterior and posterior aspects of the sinus tarsi, which are the anterior and posterior joint surfaces of the subtalar joint ( 15 ). Consequently, the subtalar arthroereisis screw restores the normal motion axis of the subtalar joint, corrects the force line of the hindfoot, restores the foot arch, eliminates excessive valgus, and significantly reduces the mechanical load on the posterior tibial tendon insertion point.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is due to its design, which aligns with the directional characteristics of the sinus tarsi. Implementation of the subtalar arthroereisis screw evenly distributes axial stress across the anterior and posterior aspects of the sinus tarsi (i.e., subtalar anterior and posterior joint surfaces) during weight-bearing ( 15 ). This helps restore the normal motion axis of the subtalar joint, correct the force line of the foot, mitigate excessive eversion, and significantly reduce mechanical load on the posterior tibial tendon insertion ( 16 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, the HyProCure device, made of medical-grade titanium alloy, is designed to remain in the body without routine removal. Moreover, finite element analysis and biomechanical assessment of a cadaveric study reported that the HyProCure device exhibited a more obvious effect of deformity correction than type I EOTTS ( 43 , 44 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the 57 patients (77 feet) included in our study, 20 (16.1%) were female and 37 (83.9%) were male, with an average age of 13.9 years (range, [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. All patients were thoroughly followed-up for a minimum of 18 months, with an average duration of 26.8 months (range, 18-63 months).…”
Section: General Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a consequence, there is no uniform standard regarding the position and orientation of implants following modification. In a study conducted by Wang et al ( 16 ), a comparison was made between two different types of devices, with two different insert positions, in order to assess the ability to correct the flatfoot deformity. The study utilized a cadaveric flatfoot model and found that HyproCure exhibited greater correction ability in both the transverse and sagittal planes when compared with Talar-Fit.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%