Biomaterials for Organ and Tissue Regeneration 2020
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-08-102906-0.00024-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomechanical characterization of engineered tissues and implants for tissue/organ replacement applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 115 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It would also be interesting to carry out a pull-out test or rotational test of the embedded posts, but it was not possible due to the limited sample size and geometry samples availability. Pull-out test data, however, are more rate-dependent, so it would require more samples to extrapolate the results to proper strains or deformation rates having clinical relevance [ 25 ]. Furthermore, soft tissues in the pull-out might undergo much more non-uniform deformation or even tearing so data quality would not be certain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It would also be interesting to carry out a pull-out test or rotational test of the embedded posts, but it was not possible due to the limited sample size and geometry samples availability. Pull-out test data, however, are more rate-dependent, so it would require more samples to extrapolate the results to proper strains or deformation rates having clinical relevance [ 25 ]. Furthermore, soft tissues in the pull-out might undergo much more non-uniform deformation or even tearing so data quality would not be certain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is sometimes a confusion in the literature about the definition of the shear strains, and in the authors’ opinion the definition used in experiments should always be reported in sufficient detail. For dynamic shear amplitude here, an additional factor of ½ is due to the average amplitude (max–min angle) around the mean static deformation at that time point [ 21 , 25 ]. The stiffness (static and dynamic values in kPa) in this case was calculated as the ratio of respective stress σ i to true or engineering strain ε i [ 26 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known that convolution integrals do not in general have a closed analytical form, however, they can be obtained as such for the simple loading (stimulation) patterns, for example, creep, linear ramp, or harmonic case [ 25 ]. For the latter, authors [ 10 , 25 , 26 ] have previously shown that the dynamic stress/strain ratio (“dynamic stiffness”) can be expressed as: where σ dyn is the applied dynamic stress amplitude, ω —Circular frequency, C ω0 = E 0 × (τ 0 ×ω) α is the viscostiffness (quasi-property in units of kPa·s α ) [ 25 ], α —Dynamic material memory parameter, E 0 —Intrinsic dynamic elasticity, τ 0 —Intrinsic characteristic time. This Equation (2) time-convolutes the specimen loading history at every frequency without Fourier transform or assumptions of a material model (Maxwell, Burger, standard linear solid, Prony series, etc.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GAIN scaffolds biomechanical characterization was performed as referred to § 10 of Annex I of EU Medical Devices Regulations (2017/745) to align the data with the physiologically important limits (frequency 1 Hz, deformation amplitudes for the typical cells size range) [ 8 , 10 , 24 ]. Specimens geometry was controlled with ±1 µm precision using non-contact laser micrometer (Metralight, Inc., Burlingame, CA, USA).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation