2020
DOI: 10.1155/2020/5769293
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomechanical Comparison of a New Memory Compression Alloy Plate versus Traditional Titanium Plate for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Finite Element Analysis

Abstract: Objective. To compare the biomechanical properties of a new memory compression alloy plate and traditional titanium plate after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Methods. A finite element model of the C3-7 segments was developed and validated. The C5-6 disc was removed, and an intervertebral cage made of peek material was implanted. Then, a new memory compression alloy plate composed of Ti-Ni memory alloy and a traditional titanium plate were integrated at the C5-6 segment. All models were subjec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Von Mises stress is widely used in FE study to evaluate the orthopedic implant design and risks for subsidence and implant failure ( Yu et al, 2016 ; Zhang et al, 2016 ; Liu et al, 2020 ; Wo et al, 2021 ). Besides, the stress distribution on the surface of the implant may reflect the load transfer of different implants and biomechanical environments ( Yu et al, 2016 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Von Mises stress is widely used in FE study to evaluate the orthopedic implant design and risks for subsidence and implant failure ( Yu et al, 2016 ; Zhang et al, 2016 ; Liu et al, 2020 ; Wo et al, 2021 ). Besides, the stress distribution on the surface of the implant may reflect the load transfer of different implants and biomechanical environments ( Yu et al, 2016 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present test complete model yielded a range of motion (ROM) in C3-4, C4-5, and C5-6 segments in forwarding flexion-extension (5.4°, 5.9°, 4.9°/3.9°, 4.2°, and 4.1°), lateral bending (6.8°, 5.4°, and 4.4°), and rotational (6.3°, 5.4°, and 4.2°) conditions, consistent with previous findings. Therefore, the FEA model in the present experimental study was valid [ 17 , 21 , 22 ].
Fig.
…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the mismatch between the cage and the vertebral body after surgery and the excessive elastic modulus often lead to postoperative complications, including cage subsidence, adjacent intervertebral disc degeneration, and bone non-union [ 23 ]. Previous studies have shown that bionic implants can better distribute stress [ 13 , 21 ], however, only a few reports of custom anatomical intervertebral fusions are available and the benefits of bionic implants have not been quantified. In this work, we evaluated the advantages of using personalized data from the cervical spine to build a bionic cage, validated its impact on the biomechanics of adjacent segments after ACDF, and compared it to a conventional cage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, biomechanical research works found that the plate could provide better segmental stability than Zero-profile spacer [27,28], which was consistent with our findings. Loss of CL is often considered to cause progressive degenerative cervical spondylosis (DCS) and also be responsible for neck pain and neurological dysfunction [5,[29][30][31][32]. However, the higher LOC after ACDF with ZP device, especially the data of LOC in CL as high as 48.13% given by Sun et al [13] in the 5-year followup, makes us worry about the condition of patients in the longer term.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%