2015
DOI: 10.1177/0363546515591994
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomechanical Comparison of Arthroscopic Repair Constructs for Radial Tears of the Meniscus

Abstract: Background: Radial tears of the meniscus represent a challenging clinical scenario because benign neglect and partial meniscectomy have both been shown to have negative biomechanical and long-term clinical consequences.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
32
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
5
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While the biomimetic scaffold mimicked the topography and tensile properties of native menisci, it did not improve the mechanical properties of a simulated radial meniscal tear repaired with suture. Both the ultimate failure load (~125 N) and stiffness (~19 N/mm) of the repair and scaffold-augmented groups are comparable to reported values using similar suture techniques in cadaveric models (Beamer et al 2015 ; Bhatia et al 2015 ; Branch et al 2015 ; Herbort et al 2010 ). In testing different suture techniques, Herbort et al ( 2010 ) and Branch et al ( 2015 ) confirmed that multiple sutures are superior to a single suture loop, providing in vitro support to the clinical standard of using an inside-out double horizontal suture technique for repair of radial tears.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…While the biomimetic scaffold mimicked the topography and tensile properties of native menisci, it did not improve the mechanical properties of a simulated radial meniscal tear repaired with suture. Both the ultimate failure load (~125 N) and stiffness (~19 N/mm) of the repair and scaffold-augmented groups are comparable to reported values using similar suture techniques in cadaveric models (Beamer et al 2015 ; Bhatia et al 2015 ; Branch et al 2015 ; Herbort et al 2010 ). In testing different suture techniques, Herbort et al ( 2010 ) and Branch et al ( 2015 ) confirmed that multiple sutures are superior to a single suture loop, providing in vitro support to the clinical standard of using an inside-out double horizontal suture technique for repair of radial tears.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Both the ultimate failure load (~125 N) and stiffness (~19 N/mm) of the repair and scaffold-augmented groups are comparable to reported values using similar suture techniques in cadaveric models (Beamer et al 2015 ; Bhatia et al 2015 ; Branch et al 2015 ; Herbort et al 2010 ). In testing different suture techniques, Herbort et al ( 2010 ) and Branch et al ( 2015 ) confirmed that multiple sutures are superior to a single suture loop, providing in vitro support to the clinical standard of using an inside-out double horizontal suture technique for repair of radial tears. In this study, a single horizontal stitch was placed equidistant from the central and peripheral rims to reduce the torn edges before performing a double horizontal mattress suture repair, with or without inclusion of the biomimetic scaffold serving as a sheath.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some sports have a higher prevalence of ACL injuries and others have prevalence of meniscal injuries. Few studies correlate ligament and meniscus injury to the sport practiced 11, 12, 13, 14…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The biomechanical consequences of near full thickness radial tears that violate the circumferential band result in substantial changes in joint loading. 6,7 The authors conclude that clinical success can be achieved by properly indicated radial tear repairs. Can we do better?…”
Section: See Related Article On Page 1919mentioning
confidence: 91%