2012
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00330.2012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomechanical constraints on the feedforward regulation of endpoint stiffness

Abstract: Although many daily tasks tend to destabilize arm posture, it is still possible to have stable interactions with the environment by regulating the multijoint mechanics of the arm in a task-appropriate manner. For postural tasks, this regulation involves the appropriate control of endpoint stiffness, which represents the stiffness of the arm at the hand. Although experimental studies have been used to evaluate endpoint stiffness control, including the orientation of maximal stiffness, the underlying neural stra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, forearm supination would require more complex neuromotor adjustments from the sensory and motor systems (Borges et al 2007). The results of the present work are in line with recent studies that suggested the influence of biomechanical constraints on muscle control of end-point position regarding the direction of movement (Hu, Murray, and Perreault 2012;Tee et al 2010). These last authors used a musculoskeletal model of the human arm for investigating the control of end-point stiffness (i.e.…”
Section: Effect Of Id and Direction Of Movement On Muscular Activitysupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Thus, forearm supination would require more complex neuromotor adjustments from the sensory and motor systems (Borges et al 2007). The results of the present work are in line with recent studies that suggested the influence of biomechanical constraints on muscle control of end-point position regarding the direction of movement (Hu, Murray, and Perreault 2012;Tee et al 2010). These last authors used a musculoskeletal model of the human arm for investigating the control of end-point stiffness (i.e.…”
Section: Effect Of Id and Direction Of Movement On Muscular Activitysupporting
confidence: 90%
“…This yielded an estimated equivalent stiffness K = 5384 N/m and an estimated equivalent viscosity C = 808 N s/m. Though approximate, stiffness estimates are well in keeping with those reported by Hu et al (2012) for maximally stiffened arms in the horizontal plane.…”
Section: Can We Do Without Predictive Control?supporting
confidence: 83%
“…Finally, the U-grip condition is different from both B-grip conditions in that different muscles are involved in maintaining the required high grip baseline and in stabilizing the limb at one end-point. There is evidence, however, that the stiffening of the arm and that of the fingers are actually correlated (Friedman and Flash 2007;Hu et al 2012). One can then assume that the upsurge of arm agonist activity and the concomitant release of the antagonist activity marking the brisk onset of the movement is accompanied by a similar alteration of the force balance at the finger level.…”
Section: Can We Do Without Predictive Control?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One hypothesis for this difference would be that more muscle degeneration is induced by more eccentric contraction of the proximal muscles needed for essential daily activities, therefore higher stresses . With simulations of these essential activities, such as sit‐to‐stand movement, ascending and descending stairs, arm reaching movement, and holding the arm against gravity in various postures, muscle contraction patterns and the associated stresses of daily activities could be derived and analyzed to test this hypothesis, and the results from these simulation studies could also potentially guide DMD patients to develop a life style that minimizes eccentric contractions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%