Biomechanical Deficit Profiles Associated with ACL Injury Risk in Female Athletes

Abstract

Purpose To quantify the prevalence of biomechanical deficit patterns associated with ACL injury risk and their inter-connections in a large cohort of female athletes during an unanticipated cutting task. Methods High school female athletes (N=721) performed an unanticipated cutting task in the biomechanics laboratory. Trunk and lower extremity 3D kinetics and kinematics were measured and entered into a latent profile analysis model. Results Approximately 40% of female athletes demonstrated no biomechanical deficits and were categorized into the low risk group. The second most prevalent profile (24%) demonstrated a combination of high quadriceps and leg dominance deficits and was labeled as quadriceps-leg. The third most prevalent profile (22%) demonstrated a combination of trunk and leg dominance deficits and to lesser extent ligament dominance deficits, and was labeled as trunk-leg-ligament. Finally, the fourth profile (14%) demonstrated very high ligament dominance deficits only and it was labeled as ligament dominance profile. Conclusions This is the first study to identify the most common biomechanical profiles associated with ACL injury during a cutting task in a large cohort of female athletes. Approximately 60% of female athletes belong to one of the high-risk profiles. With the exception of the ligament dominance profile, the current analysis indicates that risk profiles consist of a combination of biomechanical deficits. The findings provide important insight into the prevalence of biomechanical deficits and future directions for the development of injury prevention programs. The findings can be used to guide the development of quick and easy tests that accurately categorize athletes into one of the profiles and subsequently prescribe tailored injury prevention programs that will be more effective and efficient than the current generic ones.

Role of the Penultimate Foot Contact During Change of Direction: Implications on Performance and Risk of Injury

“…This technique facilitates and distributes the loading across twofoot contacts, thus maximising braking impulse over the PFC due to the longer GCT, and potentially lowering forces during the FFC. Conversely, illustrated in Figure 5B (66). In this review we have qualitatively identified two different 180° turning strategies ( Figure 3); turning strategy A may be safer from an injury reduction perspective due to the capacity to distribute loading across two-foot contacts.…”

Do knee abduction kinematics and kinetics predict future anterior cruciate ligament injury risk? A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies

“…Twenty full-text articles were then screened. Of those, 10 articles were excluded due to not meeting the inclusion/exclusion criteria [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34]. Of the remaining ten articles, three articles [35][36][37] used the total number of lower extremity injuries as an outcome and one study [38] used a combined measure of knee abduction and trunk lean.…”

The effect of limb dominance on change of direction biomechanics: A systematic review of its importance for injury risk

“…Although the mechanisms of non-contact ACL injury are multifactorial, 61,120 strength, neuromechanical, and dynamic control between-limb differences (side to side differences/asymmetries), and overall lower-limb dominance has been suggested to be a potential ACL injury risk factor. 14,62,63,89,110,111,116 Limb dominance, also known as lateral preference or laterality, 22,82 refers to the concept that humans will preferentially use one side of the body when performing a motor task, typically resulting in a more skilful and therefore dominant side. 22,82 A preferred leg to kick a ball is typically used to indicate limb/skill dominance and as such, practitioners and researchers are interested whether a particular leg is at a heightened injury risk.…”