2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.09.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomechanical determinants of the stability of dental implants: Influence of the bone–implant interface properties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
87
0
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 130 publications
1
87
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…However, aseptic loosening represents one of the main causes of failure of cementless orthopedic implants [3, 4]. Micromotions at the bone-implant interface may induce the development of fibrous tissue around the implant, which could be responsible for aseptic loosening [58]. The implant primary stability is a major determinant of the surgical success of hip arthroplasty surgery [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, aseptic loosening represents one of the main causes of failure of cementless orthopedic implants [3, 4]. Micromotions at the bone-implant interface may induce the development of fibrous tissue around the implant, which could be responsible for aseptic loosening [58]. The implant primary stability is a major determinant of the surgical success of hip arthroplasty surgery [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For cells to attach onto implant biomaterials, having the hardness of the materials comparable to the extracellular matrix is an important factor, in which this is totally contrary to the requirement of hard and tough metal-based structural implants [24]. With the PEMs coating, the hardness of the material substrates could be greatly reduced to about 1/3 of that of bone tissue (0.6 to 0.8 GPa) [25,26], therefore, this C/PGA coating can be a simple and practical approach to modify the surface mechanical properties of biometals. …”
Section: Mechanical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Osseocare (Nobel Biocare) ise frezlerin giriş torkunun ölçümü ile çalışmaktadır ve yine primer stabilitenin belirlenmesi için bir değer sağladığı konusunda bir kanıt yoktur. Periotest değerleri ve kemik-implant bağlantısının değerlendirildiği bir çalışmada, cihazın implantı çevreleyen kemiğin özelliklerine duyarlı olduğu, kemikimplant bağlantısını herhangi bir şekilde değerlendir-mediği bildirilmiştir 37 . Aynı çalışmada rezonans frekans analizinin, implantı çevreleyen kemiğe duyarlı olduğu ve implantın stabilitesini belirleyen ISQ (Implant stability quotient) değeri ile implantın anatomik lokasyonu arasındaki ilişkinin kanıtlandığı bildirilmiştir.…”
Section: İmplant Stabilitesiunclassified