SAE Technical Paper Series 2001
DOI: 10.4271/2001-01-1173
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomechanics of the Patient Compartment of Ambulance Vehicles under Crash Conditions: Testing Countermeasures to Mitigate Injury

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…17 A study published in 2001 retrospectively analyzed all fatal EMVCs in the United States over an 11-year period. [22][23][24][25][26][27] Risk to Safety in the General Public The effect of L&S use on the safety of the general public is clearly demonstrated by the excessive number of EMVCs that occur every year. 18 Data were obtained from the National Highway and Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA; Washington, DC USA) Fatal Accident Reporting System (FARS).…”
Section: Reportmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…17 A study published in 2001 retrospectively analyzed all fatal EMVCs in the United States over an 11-year period. [22][23][24][25][26][27] Risk to Safety in the General Public The effect of L&S use on the safety of the general public is clearly demonstrated by the excessive number of EMVCs that occur every year. 18 Data were obtained from the National Highway and Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA; Washington, DC USA) Fatal Accident Reporting System (FARS).…”
Section: Reportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 It is not surprising that the rear compartment poses higher risk to the EMS provider given the need for mobility during vehicle movement, potentially limited use of safety restraints by an EMS provider, potential for multiple providers in the compartment, and inherent safety risk in the design given multiple cabinets and sharp edges and numerous unsecured medical equipment that become lethal projectiles if an ambulance suddenly decelerated. [22][23][24][25][26][27] Risk to Safety in the General Public The effect of L&S use on the safety of the general public is clearly demonstrated by the excessive number of EMVCs that occur every year. A study of fatal ambulance collisions found that the ambulance was the striking vehicle in over 76% of accidents.…”
Section: Effect Of Lands Use On Ambulance Response and Transport Timesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19 Levick et al evaluated ambulance patient compartments under crash conditions; they demonstrated the need for special testing to be done for the compartment. 20,21,22 Maguire and Kahn note that fatigue may be associated with the risk of crashes. 23 Medical residents working on ambulances also are at risk of ambulance crash-related injuries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While 96 percent of patients were restrained at the time of the crash, only 33 percent of patients were restrained properly with both lateral belts and shoulder straps (Smith, 2015). Unrestrained individuals are significantly more likely to be injured or killed in a crash, and may also injure those around them (Levick, Li, andYannaccone, 2001a, 2001b) because unrestrained individuals can become projectiles themselves. Similar issues may apply to improperly restrained individuals.…”
Section: Improved Ambulance Designmentioning
confidence: 99%