2020
DOI: 10.1201/9780429173462
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biometry for Forestry and Environmental Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
64
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
64
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the similar accuracy of both solutions is not a surprise. Nonetheless, the use of mixed-effects models as a solution enabling the description of group-specific relationships for all groups of the dataset [19] is definitely worth considering, especially when there is a possibility of non-invasively obtaining additional data for random effects prediction [50].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, the similar accuracy of both solutions is not a surprise. Nonetheless, the use of mixed-effects models as a solution enabling the description of group-specific relationships for all groups of the dataset [19] is definitely worth considering, especially when there is a possibility of non-invasively obtaining additional data for random effects prediction [50].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of the fixed-effects model (first strategy), we used all fitted model parameters, whereas for the mixed-effects model, we applied fixed parameters only. For both fitting strategies, the predicted stem volume was computed by numerical integration [11,19]. The volumes for both strategies in combination with the volumes calculated using the empirical volume equation currently used in Poland [31]:…”
Section: Volume Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two predictor variables are of special interest: the time interval over which the ingrowth trees are appearing and the plot size. In the literature, these variables are called exposure variables (Baetschmann and Winkelmann 2012;Mehtätalo and Lappi 2020). A natural assumption is that the expected number of ingrowth counts is proportional to both exposure time and the plot size.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, the ingrowth is modeled in the framework of generalized linear mixed models (Stroup 2013;Zuur et al 2012;Mehtätalo and Lappi 2020). More specifically, the ingrowth is modeled using a zero-inflated negative binomial mixed model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, due to properties of the site, two Scots pine trees from the same stand are generally more alike than two Scots pine trees from different stands. The variance-covariance structure between observations affects the standard errors of the estimated regression coefficients, so ignoring within group correlations in the model construction phase may lead to severe problems in parameter estimates and model inference (Mehtätalo and Lappi 2020). Therefore, instead of regular linear models that are fitted with the ordinary least squares method and the assumption that the residuals are uncorrelated, linear-mixed effects (LME) models should be used to take the correlation structure into account.…”
Section: Linear Mixed-effects Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%