2008
DOI: 10.1038/ngeo101
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biophysical controls on organic carbon fluxes in fluvial networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

43
1,147
6
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,221 publications
(1,200 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
43
1,147
6
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent work emphasizes the importance of headwater rivers in this context. Headwater rivers receive the bulk of terrestrial carbon entering a river network 2 . Headwaters contribute significantly to CO 2 outgassing via microbial activity 3 , which partly reflects the geomorphic complexity of low-order streams created by spatial variations of hydraulics and substrate 4 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recent work emphasizes the importance of headwater rivers in this context. Headwater rivers receive the bulk of terrestrial carbon entering a river network 2 . Headwaters contribute significantly to CO 2 outgassing via microbial activity 3 , which partly reflects the geomorphic complexity of low-order streams created by spatial variations of hydraulics and substrate 4 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Watershed-scale carbon sequestration fluxes in tropical rivers may strongly reflect episodic disturbances, such as landslides and floods, whereas fluxes in rivers with less intense disturbance regimes may strongly reflect river geomorphic complexity that facilitates carbon storage. Geomorphic complexity in this context includes channel-spanning obstructions such as logjams or beaver dams that facilitate transient carbon storage and enhanced biological uptake over a few hours in a pool, as well as sequestration via sedimentation over thousands of years on a floodplain 2,3,[14][15][16] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transit time distributions in rivers control the opportunity for biological uptake and transformation of a variety of critical constituents, including nitrogen, phosphorus, carbon, and toxic contaminants [Alexander et al, 2000;Battin et al, 2003Battin et al, , 2008Raymond et al, 2013;Marzadri et al, 2014]. Travel times in rivers and watersheds are very broadly distributed [Kirchner et al, 2000;Haggerty et al, 2002;Stonedahl et al, 2012;Aubeneau et al, 2014], but the mechanisms that produce travel time distributions over many orders of magnitude are not known precisely [Boano et al, 2014].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The decomposition of litter as a mechanism of nutrient release is a key process in the functioning of both natural and modified ecosystems (Jonczak 2013;Berg and McClaugherty 2014). Plant litter decomposition in inland waters contributes significantly to global nutrient cycles ), particularly in flowing waters, such as forest streams and rivers (Battin et al 2008(Battin et al , 2009). In forest rivers, plant litter is an essential part of the food web and ecological functioning (Wallace et al 1997;Gessner et al 1999) because it provides large inputs of energy and nutrients to an aquatic ecosystem that typically exhibits low levels of primary productivity (Wallace et al 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%