2008
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-6572-9_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biophysical Interactions Between Timber Trees and Arabica Coffee in Suboptimal Conditions of Central America

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

4
24
0
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
4
24
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Under suboptimal (hotter and drier) growing conditions, coffee production in full sun is lower than in the shade (De Freitas et al 2003;van Kanten and Vaast 2006) which has been related to the high sensitivity of coffee g s to VPD l (DaMatta and Ramalho 2006;Ronquim et al 2006;Vaast et al 2007). As shade trees reduce wind speed and leaf temperature while increasing air humidity, and hence reducing VPD l and the stomatal limitations of coffee A n , agroforestry systems have been recommended for suboptimal growing conditions (DaMatta 2004;DaMatta et al 2007;Vaast et al 2007). Nevertheless, DaMatta et al (2007) have emphasized that, under optimal or near-optimal edapho-climatic conditions, shade provides little, if any, benefit to the crop.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Under suboptimal (hotter and drier) growing conditions, coffee production in full sun is lower than in the shade (De Freitas et al 2003;van Kanten and Vaast 2006) which has been related to the high sensitivity of coffee g s to VPD l (DaMatta and Ramalho 2006;Ronquim et al 2006;Vaast et al 2007). As shade trees reduce wind speed and leaf temperature while increasing air humidity, and hence reducing VPD l and the stomatal limitations of coffee A n , agroforestry systems have been recommended for suboptimal growing conditions (DaMatta 2004;DaMatta et al 2007;Vaast et al 2007). Nevertheless, DaMatta et al (2007) have emphasized that, under optimal or near-optimal edapho-climatic conditions, shade provides little, if any, benefit to the crop.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Limitation of photosynthesis by low light availability has been proposed as one of the main reasons for lower yields of coffee grown in agroforestry systems in optimal coffee production areas such as southeastern Brazil (DaMatta et al 2007) and the Central American highlands (Beer et al 1998). Under suboptimal (hotter and drier) growing conditions, coffee production in full sun is lower than in the shade (De Freitas et al 2003;van Kanten and Vaast 2006) which has been related to the high sensitivity of coffee g s to VPD l (DaMatta and Ramalho 2006;Ronquim et al 2006;Vaast et al 2007). As shade trees reduce wind speed and leaf temperature while increasing air humidity, and hence reducing VPD l and the stomatal limitations of coffee A n , agroforestry systems have been recommended for suboptimal growing conditions (DaMatta 2004;DaMatta et al 2007;Vaast et al 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although shade cover can be beneficial for coffee growth and production in suboptimal climatic conditions (Vaast et al, 2008), it is important to regulate the quantity of shade, because too much of it can result in a very humid microclimate conducive to higher incidence of fungal diseases such as leaf rust (caused by Hemileia vastatrix) (Avelino et al, 2007) and American leaf spot (caused by Mycena citricolor) (Wintgens, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%