The advantages of associating shade trees in coffee agroforestry systems (AFS) are generally thought to be restricted mostly to poor soil and suboptimal ecological conditions for coffee cultivation whereas their role in optimal conditions remains controversial. Thus, the objective of this study was to investigate, under the optimal coffee cultivation conditions of the Central Valley of Costa Rica, the impact of Inga densiflora, a very common shade tree in Central America, on the microclimate, yield and vegetative development of shaded coffee in comparison to coffee monoculture (MC). Maximum temperature of shaded coffee leaves was reduced by up to 5°C relative to coffee leaf temperature in MC. The minimum air temperature at night was 0.5°C higher in AFS than air temperature in MC demonstrating the buffering effects of shade trees. As judged by the lower relative extractable water (REW) in the deep soil layers during the dry season, water use in AFS was higher than in MC. Nevertheless, competition for water between coffee and associated trees was assumed to be limited as REW in the 0-150 cm soil layer was always higher than 0.3 in shaded coffee compared to 0.4 in monoculture. Coffee production was quite similar in both systems during the establishment of shade trees, however a yield decrease of 30% was observed in AFS compared to MC with a decrease in radiation transmittance to less than 40% during the latter years in the absence of an adequate shade tree pruning. As a result of the high contribution (60%) of shade trees to overall biomass, permanent aerial biomass accumulation in AFS amounted to two times the biomass accumulated in MC after 7 years. Thus provided an adequate pruning, Inga-shaded plantations appeared more advantageous than MC in optimal conditions, especially considering the fact that coffee AFS provides high quality coffee, farmers' revenue diversification and environmental benefits.

No abstract

This article appeared in a journal published by Elsevier. The attached copy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial research and education use, including for instruction at the authors institution and sharing with colleagues.Other uses, including reproduction and distribution, or selling or licensing copies, or posting to personal, institutional or third party websites are prohibited.In most cases authors are permitted to post their version of the article (e.g. in Word or Tex form) to their personal website or institutional repository. Authors requiring further information regarding Elsevier's archiving and manuscript policies are encouraged to visit: http://www.elsevier.com/copyright Author's personal copyRainfall partitioning into throughfall, stemflow and interception loss in a coffee (Coffea arabica L.) monoculture compared to an agroforestry system with Inga densiflora

No abstract