2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0045-6535(00)00057-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bioremediation of a soil contaminated by hydrocarbon mixtures: the residual concentration problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
64
2
5

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
6
64
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…[9][10][11][12] As reported by Heitzer and Sayler, while pollutants and intermediates are important chemical monitoring parameters, only the formation of end products such as CO 2 provides direct proof of the complete destruction and mineralization of a pollutant. 13 A Hewlett-Packard 5890A II gas chromatograph was used to analyze the headspaces from hermetically stopper Pyrex filter flask containing soil and liquid samples.…”
Section: Determinationmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…[9][10][11][12] As reported by Heitzer and Sayler, while pollutants and intermediates are important chemical monitoring parameters, only the formation of end products such as CO 2 provides direct proof of the complete destruction and mineralization of a pollutant. 13 A Hewlett-Packard 5890A II gas chromatograph was used to analyze the headspaces from hermetically stopper Pyrex filter flask containing soil and liquid samples.…”
Section: Determinationmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…During pure oxygen aeration, the release rate of CO 2 is 0.013 mol/d. However, the production of CO 2 is reduced to 0.004 mol/d during air aeration [27] . In addition, tillage separate the soil block into small ones and mixes the soil.…”
Section: Design Of the Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, it is assumed that the microorganisms had a longer adaptation time, and when the biopiles were constructed after the pretreatment, the developing stage of the microorganisms could have been optimal, and degradation of contaminants was not so slow. Other authors have demonstrated the importance of aeration in this type of treatments, since their experiments with aeration reached a reduction of up to 95% in the first or second month of treatment, as compared to the control without aeration that did not depict a significant reduction in contaminants concentration [17][18][19].…”
Section: Parametermentioning
confidence: 99%