“…The second interpretation is based on the possibility that the left M2 belonged to an abnormally small individual. This option The data were taken from Andrews (1990), Aguilar et al (1998), Bertolini et al (1996), Bogicevic et al (2011), Bon et al (1991), Chaline (1983Chaline ( , 1972, Chaline et al (1995), Chatzopoulou et al (2001), Desclaux and Defleur (1997), Dimitrijevi c (1996), Gibbard et al (1991), Hern andez-Fern andez (2000), J anossy (1986), Kolfschoten (1990), Kotsakis (2003), Kotsakis et al (2003), Kowalski (2001), Kowalski and Nadachowski (1982), Kunst (1989), L opez-García et al (2014), Mais and Rabeder (1984), Marchetti et al (2000), Marcolini (2003), Markovi c (2008), Marquet (1989), Maul (1990), Nadachowski (1990aNadachowski ( , 1990b, Nadachowski et al (2011), Paunescu (2001, Popov (1989), Radulescu and Samson (1985), Roebroeks et al (1992), Ronchitelli et al (2011), Socha (2014, Terzea (1994), Valensi and Abbassi (1998). seems improbable due to lack of morphological differences identified in the tooth. Another conceivable scenario is that it belongs to a subadult.…”