2007
DOI: 10.5032/jae.2007.01042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biotechnology: An Assessment Of Agricultural Science Teachers' Knowledge And Attitudes

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to explore agricultural science teachers' knowledge levels and attitudes toward biotechnology topics. The average agricultural science teacher in this study was a 37-year-old male who had taught for 12 years. He had a bachelor's degree and had lived or worked on a farm or ranch. He had not attended biotechnology-related workshops or classes since he graduated from college. Agricultural science teachers in the current study had some knowledge of biotechnology. However, great variat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These results confirm those of other researches [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] carried out in the USA, Turkey, Slovenia and in several European countries concerning the attitudes of teachers or students. On the opposite, Kidman [12] showed that Australian teachers have a negative attitude towards the teaching of biotechnology, while their students have a positive attitude towards learning biotechnology and biotechnological applications.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results confirm those of other researches [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] carried out in the USA, Turkey, Slovenia and in several European countries concerning the attitudes of teachers or students. On the opposite, Kidman [12] showed that Australian teachers have a negative attitude towards the teaching of biotechnology, while their students have a positive attitude towards learning biotechnology and biotechnological applications.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The questionnaires were designed based on a variety of existing surveys of which items could be used for the purpose of the present study, including surveys on attitude towards science. The most important of these were the Eurobarometer [10], the BELBETS instruments of Kidman [12], the questionnaire of Mowen et al [15], and the CLES instrument (Constructivist Learning Environment Survey) [16].…”
Section: Design Of Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, instruments used to asses students science attitudes has historically not distinguished between the affective, behavioural or cognitive components of the tripartite model, but rather on the affective or evaluative components (Koballa Jr & Glynn, 2007) There are several examples of studies on attitudes in BTER using specific unitary models or undefined basic attitude models (Casanoves, Gonzalez, Salvado, Haro, & Novo, 2015;S. Y. Chen, Chu, Lin, & Chiang, 2016;Dawson & Schibeci, 2003;Kidman, 2009;Mowen, Roberts, Wingenbach, & Harlin, 2007;Prokop, Lešková, Kubiatko, & Diran, 2007). This approach also holds true for studies in other related research areas such as attitudes towards modern biotechnology among the general public or among consumers (Costa-Font & Mossialos, 2006;Gaskell et al, 2004;Magnusson & Hursti, 2002).…”
Section: Attitude Models In Science Education Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Literatürde bahsi geçen değişkenlerin öğretmenlerin ve/veya öğretmen adaylarının BGM tutumu ve farkındalığı üzerine etkisi ile ilgili çalışmalar bulunmaktadır. Tutum ve farkındalığın belirlendiği bazı çalışmalarda, BGM tutumu ve farkındalığının bu değişkenlere göre anlamlı fark gösterdiği tespit edilirken (Öcal, 2012;Prokop vd., 2007;Mohapatra vd., 2010;Simon, 2010), bazı çalışmalarda da biyoteknoloji bilgi seviyesinin bu değişkenlerden etkilenmediği gösterilmiştir (Özel, Erdoğan, Uşak ve Prokop, 2009;Çiçekçi, 2008;Balemen, 2009;Türkmen & Darçın, 2007;Uyanıker, 2008;Mowen, Roberts, Wingenbach, & Harlin, 2007).…”
Section: Tartişma Sonuç Ve öNeri̇lerunclassified