1983
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4757-0740-3_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biotic Interactions in Benthic Foraminifera

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
65
0
1

Year Published

1989
1989
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
1
65
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Those with upright or tubular test structures were classified as suspension feeders and those lacking upright structures, or found under nodules or in subsurface sediment (as well as on the upper nodule surfaces), were grouped as deposit feeders. These groupings of foraminifera1 taxa (listed by Mullineaux 1987) are consistent with available information on feeding of benthic foraminifers (Christiansen 197 1;Sleigh 1973;DeLaca et al 1980;Lipps 1983;Jones and Charnock 1985). One deviation from previous work is the classification here of Saccorhiza ramosa as a deposit feeder.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Those with upright or tubular test structures were classified as suspension feeders and those lacking upright structures, or found under nodules or in subsurface sediment (as well as on the upper nodule surfaces), were grouped as deposit feeders. These groupings of foraminifera1 taxa (listed by Mullineaux 1987) are consistent with available information on feeding of benthic foraminifers (Christiansen 197 1;Sleigh 1973;DeLaca et al 1980;Lipps 1983;Jones and Charnock 1985). One deviation from previous work is the classification here of Saccorhiza ramosa as a deposit feeder.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The distinguishing features of reticulopodia, such as rapid bidirectional movement of intracellular organelles and plasma membrane surface domains, and development of extensive networks, provided early Foraminifera with a greatly enhanced ability to gather and manipulate particles and to construct various types of test (31). The development of reticulopodia, and the subsequent building of the test, were crucial for the initial diversification of the group, providing the Foraminifera with shelter from predation and adverse environmental conditions, as well as with a compartment in which to store food and to protect juveniles (32).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the presence of macrofauna does not seem to limit foraminiferal populations in these regions, possibly because there is enough food to sustain both faunal components. However, Woulds et al (2007;this volume) Only a few metazoans, notably scaphopods and certain isopods, are known to be specialist predators on foraminiferans (Lipps, 1983;Svavarsson et al, 1993;Gudmundsson et al, 2000Gudmundsson et al, , 2003. Occasional scaphopods, which were usually dead, occurred at 140, 1405-1530 m and 1850 m depth; isopods were common only at 1850 m (Murty, 2005;Hughes et al, this volume).…”
Section: Foraminiferan-metazoan Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%