1991
DOI: 10.1016/0045-6535(91)90021-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biotransfer and bioaccumulation of PCDD/PCDFs from soil: Controlled exposure studies of chickens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Follow-up studies were performed during the winter at the first farm and the levels in eggs from hens that were kept inside, strongly suggested that the source of the contamination was not the feed, but the outdoor environment (unpublished). Similar has been observed in other studies but in these cases the soil was clearly contaminated with dioxins (Stephens et al 1990, 1995, Schuler et al 1997, Lovett et al 1998, Harnly et al 2000, Petreas et al 1991, Air et al 2002, Pussemier et al 2004. Another study was performed in the autumn of 2003, when a large number of farms producing organic eggs were visited and investigated for possible sources of dioxins and factors that may contribute to the exposure of hens to dioxins (Brandsma et al 2004).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Follow-up studies were performed during the winter at the first farm and the levels in eggs from hens that were kept inside, strongly suggested that the source of the contamination was not the feed, but the outdoor environment (unpublished). Similar has been observed in other studies but in these cases the soil was clearly contaminated with dioxins (Stephens et al 1990, 1995, Schuler et al 1997, Lovett et al 1998, Harnly et al 2000, Petreas et al 1991, Air et al 2002, Pussemier et al 2004. Another study was performed in the autumn of 2003, when a large number of farms producing organic eggs were visited and investigated for possible sources of dioxins and factors that may contribute to the exposure of hens to dioxins (Brandsma et al 2004).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…It was verified an equilibrium between the dioxin concentration in the contaminant ingested by chickens (38.85 pg WHO-TEQ/g) and the dioxin concentration in the eggs (42.25 pg WHO-TEQ/g), which is confirmed by other study [1] [14]. The fact that the square of the Pearson correlation coefficient (r 2 ) of the different congeners relative concentrations between litters and hatching eggs (r 2 = 0.72 and sd = 0.16) and the graphic representations of the profiles was so consistent, may be explained by the estrogens produced during egg production which stimulate the liver to produce the egg-yolk targeted, very-low density lipoprotein (VLDLy).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…An equilibrium between the dioxin content of the soil and its content in the eggs is reached relatively fast (Petreas et al, 1991). Estimates of the dioxin levels in the soil in Europe lie between 0.5 and 87 pg TEQ per g dry matter (see Table 1 , Anon., 2003).…”
Section: Dioxins In Soilsmentioning
confidence: 99%