1992
DOI: 10.1101/gad.6.12a.2429
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biphasic effect of Max on Myc cotransformation activity and dependence on amino- and carboxy-terminal Max functions.

Abstract: In Ras cotransformation assays, Max exhibited a biphasic effect on Myc transformation activity. Cotransfection of low levels of Max expression plasmid stimulated Myc transformation activity, but cotransfection of high levels suppressed it. Mutations in the functionally undefined Max amino-and carboxy-terminal regions outside of the B/HLH/LZ motif partly separated these activities, suggesting various modes of Max regulation. We demonstrate that the Max protein is a nuclear protein in vivo and identify a carboxy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
42
0

Year Published

1993
1993
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
6
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We show here that, although synergy does not occur on proximal E-boxes, Myc and Max do synergize to trans-activate the prothymosin-~ reporter. This is in agreement with the synergy observed for Myc and Max in transformation (Prendergast et al 1992). It is still unclear why Myc and Max only synergize to activate from distal sites and not from proximal sites.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We show here that, although synergy does not occur on proximal E-boxes, Myc and Max do synergize to trans-activate the prothymosin-~ reporter. This is in agreement with the synergy observed for Myc and Max in transformation (Prendergast et al 1992). It is still unclear why Myc and Max only synergize to activate from distal sites and not from proximal sites.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…In contrast to transformation assays, we observed little to no inhibition of Myc-mediated trans-activation by high concentrations of Max expression plasmids; biochemically, this might reflect the higher affinity of Max in forming heterodimers with Myc rather than homodimers. We suggest, therefore, that the apparent inhibition of focus formation observed with high concentrations of Max (Prendergast et al 1992) may be attributable to increased apoptosis and not to inhibition of transformation, and thus, may reflect increased, rather than decreased, transactivation of target genes in the transformed cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Phosphorylation and alternate splicing proximal to the basic region inhibit the ability of Max homodimers to associate with DNA in cells (Berberich and Cole, 1992;Prochownik and Van Antwerp, 1993;Zhang et al, 1997). Max association and DNA binding are required for transcriptional activation of target genes by c-Myc as well as its ability to drive proliferation, malignant cell transformation, and apoptosis (Amati et al, 1992;Kretzner et al, 1992a,b;MaÈ kelaÈ et al, 1992;Mukherjee et al, 1992;Prendergast et al, 1992;Amati et al, 1993a,b;Gu et al, 1993). Access to CACGTG binding sites in target genes may be regulated by CpG methylation of the central dinucleotide .…”
Section: C-myc Structure and Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Di erentiation of C2C12 was induced by removing shifting cells at *70% con¯uence to DMEM supplemented with 5% horse serum and antibiotics for 5 days, when myotube formation was maximal. Secondary passage rat embryo ®broblasts (REFs) were obtained from Whittaker Bioproducts and cultured and transfected as described (Prendergast et al, 1992). For transformation assays, secondary passage REFs seeded in 10 cm dishes were transfected overnight by a calcium phosphate coprecipitation method (Chen and Okayama, 1987) with 5 mg each of oncogenic Ras plus Myc, E1A, or mutant p53 expression plasmids and 10 mg of Bin1 plasmid or empty vector.…”
Section: Cell Culturementioning
confidence: 99%