2019
DOI: 10.1111/jce.14086
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bipolar ablation of epicardial posteroseptal accessory pathway

Abstract: We present a case of a 16‐year‐old male with WPW syndrome, referred for ablation after being resuscitated from cardiac arrest. Bipolar transseptal RF ablation successfully destroyed rapidly conducting epicardial posteroseptal accessory pathway after three failed attempts of endo‐ and epicardial ablation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, despite this technological progress in the field, conventional ablation of septal APs can sometimes be challenging. 7 Prolonged RFCA at high-power settings can lead to steam pop, which can be devastating. Cryoenergy can be useful; however, it has been implemented rather to minimize the risk of atrioventricular block and it is actually associated with higher recurrence rates when compared to standard RFCA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, despite this technological progress in the field, conventional ablation of septal APs can sometimes be challenging. 7 Prolonged RFCA at high-power settings can lead to steam pop, which can be devastating. Cryoenergy can be useful; however, it has been implemented rather to minimize the risk of atrioventricular block and it is actually associated with higher recurrence rates when compared to standard RFCA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…endo þ epicardial) or using very high energy. 11 Furthermore, the coronary sinus and its branches can be stenotic or occluded, as in already treated patients, or too small to be entered by ablation catheter, as in children. Furthermore, radiofrequency delivery in such a delicate site can be associated with risk of venous thrombosis/occlusion, wall damage with pericardial effusion, and coronary artery injury.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%