“…For the confirmatory factor analysis, the multiple fit indices were accepted as reference: chi-square likelihood ratio/degree of freedom (X 2 /df-CMIN/DF; 0 ≤ X 2 /df ≤ 2: good fit, 2 ≤ X 2 /df ≤ 3: acceptable fit), root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA; 0 ≤ RMSEA ≤ 0.05: good fit, 0.05 ≤ RMSEA ≤ 0: acceptable fit), normed fit index (NFI; 0.95 ≤ NFI ≤1.00: good fit, 0.90 ≤ NFI ≤ 0.95: acceptable fit), comparative fit index (CFI; 0.97 ≤ CFI ≤ 1.00: good fit, 0.95 ≤ CFI ≤ 0.97: acceptable fit), goodness of fit index (GFI; 0.95 ≤ GFI ≤ 1.00: good fit, 0.90 ≤ GFI ≤ 0.95: acceptable fit), adjusted goodness of fit index (AGFI; 0.90 ≤ AGFI ≤ 1.00: good fit, 0.85 ≤ AGFI ≤ 0.90: acceptable fit) fit index values (Erkorkmaz et al, 2013). After calculating the total scores obtained from all the scales applied for the criterion validity of the JHand, a comparison method with a previously validated scale was used with Spearman's correlation analysis (Ercan & Kan, 2004). The degree of correlation was interpreted to be a very weak correlation between 0.00-0.19, weak correlation between 0.20-0.39, moderate correlation between 0.40-0.59, strong correlation between 0.60-0.79, and a very strong correlation greater than 0.80 according to the Spearman's correlation coefficient (Evans, 1996).…”