2018
DOI: 10.20491/isarder.2018.528
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bir Gölge Bankacılık Uygulaması Olarak Gayrimenkul Finansmanında Alternatif Bir Faizsiz Finansman Modeli: İpoteğe Dayalı Paylaşımlı Faizsiz Finansman Modeli - An Alternative Non-Interest Real Estate Financing Model as a Shadow Banking Practice: Mortgage-backed Non-interest Shared Finance Model

Abstract: Konut finansmanı ülke ekonomisinin sürdürülebilir büyümesi için büyük önem taşımaktadır. Bu konu Türkiye gibi gelişmekte olan ekonomiler için daha da büyük önem taşımaktadır. Bu çalışmada Türkiye'de gayrimenkul finansmanında ve özellikle de konut finansmanında alternatif bir model olarak uygulanmakta olan tasarrufa dayalı faizsiz finansman modeli incelenmektedir. Bu açıdan bakıldığında mevcut uygulamanın bir gölge bankacılık uygulaması olduğu değerlendirilmektedir. Çalışmada ipoteğe dayalı paylaşımlı faizsiz f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In almost all of these studies, the functioning of the system has been introduced, albeit at different levels, and some of them have been compared with FKFS, bank loans, cooperatives and other different housing finance models. The reasons for choosing the system (Tekerek, 2013;Ergüven & Kaya, 2016;Ergüven, 2021Ergüven, , 2021aTursun, 2022), its legal legitimacy (Kumbasar, 2016;Birsin & Ötegeçeli, 2019;Korkmaz, 2019;Seçkiner, 2022), Islamic Compliance with financial principles (Çekin, 2018;Seçkiner, 2022), usability by participation banks (Kurt, 2019) and the risks of the system, the need for surveillance and audit (Okur et al, 2018;Yazıcı, 2019;Beybur & Çetinkaya, 2021) are the main topics examined.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In almost all of these studies, the functioning of the system has been introduced, albeit at different levels, and some of them have been compared with FKFS, bank loans, cooperatives and other different housing finance models. The reasons for choosing the system (Tekerek, 2013;Ergüven & Kaya, 2016;Ergüven, 2021Ergüven, , 2021aTursun, 2022), its legal legitimacy (Kumbasar, 2016;Birsin & Ötegeçeli, 2019;Korkmaz, 2019;Seçkiner, 2022), Islamic Compliance with financial principles (Çekin, 2018;Seçkiner, 2022), usability by participation banks (Kurt, 2019) and the risks of the system, the need for surveillance and audit (Okur et al, 2018;Yazıcı, 2019;Beybur & Çetinkaya, 2021) are the main topics examined.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%