2008
DOI: 10.1676/07-075.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bird density and mortality at windows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

3
69
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
3
69
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This could be easily explained by the high density of structures potentially dangerous for birds within the city, such as vehicles and windows. The hard impact of birds on windows is well documented (Hager et al 2008) and collisions with cars is considered the current main cause of mortality for birds (Pons 2000), with millions of individuals killed every year (Erritzoe et al 2003). Our findings comply with most other studies which have analysed admission causes for raptors at wildlife rehabilitation centres by determining that collision with human-made structures is the main admission cause for raptors inhabiting urban and suburban habitats (Wendell et al 2002;Rodríguez & Rodríguez 2010;Molina-López et al 2011).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This could be easily explained by the high density of structures potentially dangerous for birds within the city, such as vehicles and windows. The hard impact of birds on windows is well documented (Hager et al 2008) and collisions with cars is considered the current main cause of mortality for birds (Pons 2000), with millions of individuals killed every year (Erritzoe et al 2003). Our findings comply with most other studies which have analysed admission causes for raptors at wildlife rehabilitation centres by determining that collision with human-made structures is the main admission cause for raptors inhabiting urban and suburban habitats (Wendell et al 2002;Rodríguez & Rodríguez 2010;Molina-López et al 2011).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Various landscape features can influence the density of birds near windows, such as location of a dwelling, the amount of glass exposed to the environment, the immediate and surrounding vegetation, the presence of water as an attractant, and artificial lighting conditions. All species may be potentially vulnerable to window strikes, but past and current studies clearly reveal that not all species have been documented as window strike casualties [6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. Ruffed grouse (Bonasa umbellus, American woodcock (Scolopax minor), Accipiter hawks, hummingbirds, Catharus and Hylocichla thrushes, and ovenbird (Seiurus aurocapilla) are suspected to be deceived by clear and reflective panes more often because of their habits of swiftly flying through restricted passageways through dense vegetation [8,9,13,14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…American robin (Turdus migratorius) and cedar waxwing (Bombycilla cedrorum) are suspected to be more vulnerable to flying into windows after becoming intoxicated on fermented fruits [8,9,18]; accounts indicate that birds behave similar to humans when under the influence of alcohol and as such those that "drink" and fly are apt to be more vulnerable than those that do not. Addressing differential species vulnerability to windows, recent detailed studies have found North American and Neotropical migrants, those flying long distances or at night, to be killed more often than diurnal migrants or non-migratory residents [6,7,[10][11][12]. Those species known to occur in large numbers around buildings, especially in urban areas, such as rock pigeon (Columba livia), European starling (Sturnus vulgaris), and house sparrow (Passer domesticus) are known collision casualties [3,8], but at most study sites they have been recorded infrequently or not at all as window fatalities [6][7][8][9][10][11][12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations