2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2009.10.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Birth weight, sex and childhood cancer: A report from the United Kingdom Childhood Cancer Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
31
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
31
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Four of the individual studies had already used this method in their original analyses. [2629] The following variables were considered a priori to be potential confounders or independently competing exposures: birth order, ethnicity, maternal age and education (for maternal analyses); and paternal age and education (for paternal analyses) and were assessed individually for inclusion in the models. Maternal and paternal educations were the only common socio-economic level indicators that were available in all studies.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four of the individual studies had already used this method in their original analyses. [2629] The following variables were considered a priori to be potential confounders or independently competing exposures: birth order, ethnicity, maternal age and education (for maternal analyses); and paternal age and education (for paternal analyses) and were assessed individually for inclusion in the models. Maternal and paternal educations were the only common socio-economic level indicators that were available in all studies.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In one instance, we computed the latitude coordinates for study centres used and observed a clear north-south pattern but did not test this statistically (Criscione & Weinstock, 2007). Birthweight has also been associated with different childhood cancers suggesting a prenatal source of childhood cancers (Smith et al, 2009;Von Behren & Reynolds, 2003). Rankin et al (2008) report a three-fold increased occurrence of cancer (leukaemia or lymphoma (59%), solid tumour (26%), and brain tumour (15%)) amongst children with some form of congenital abnormality born and living in Northern England, even after exclusion of Down's syndrome cases (Rankin et al, 2008).…”
Section: "Photoperiod" (Latitude At Birth Diagnosis or Death) And Asmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although previous studies have shown that children born with a high birth weight had an elevated risk of brain tumors (1)(2)(3)(4), others have found no association (5)(6)(7)(8). Moreover, it has been reported that children born with a large head circumference had a higher risk of brain tumors (4,9,10), particularly in the first year of life (4,10).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of birth size characteristics, such as birth weight, fetal growth, gestational age, and head circumference, on brain tumor risk has mainly been investigated among children (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8). Although previous studies have shown that children born with a high birth weight had an elevated risk of brain tumors (1)(2)(3)(4), others have found no association (5)(6)(7)(8).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%