2006
DOI: 10.1021/om060398t
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bis(2,6-dinitroaryl)platinum(II) Complexes. Cis/Trans Isomerization

Abstract: The complexes cis-[Pt(κ2-Aryl)(κ1-Aryl)L] (κ2-Aryl = κ2-(C,O)-C6(NO2)2-2,6-(OMe)3, κ1-Aryl = κ1(C)-C6(NO2)2-2,6-(OMe)3, L = S-dmso (2 cis ), XyNC (4 cis ; Xy = 2,6-Me2C6H4), CO (5 cis ), PPh3 (7 cis )) have been obtained by reacting at room temperature cis-[Pt(κ2-Aryl)(κ1-Aryl)(OH2)] (1 cis ) with dimethyl sulfoxide (dmso; 1:1 or excess), XyNC (1:1), or CO (excess) or cis-(Me4N)[Pt(κ2-Aryl)(κ1-Aryl)Cl] with PPh3 (1:1), respectively. The room-temperature reaction of 1 cis with XyNC (1:2), of 5 cis with… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
28
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
3
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As inferred from these NMR data, cleavage of the bridging system rendered compounds trans -(C*,PPh 3 )­[PtCl­(R-C^C*)­(PPh 3 )] (R-C = Naph, 1A ; R = CO 2 Et, 1B ) as unique isomers and the subsequent replacement of Cl by py in the coordination environment of platinum proceeds with stereoretention, giving compounds trans -(C*,PPh 3 )­[Pt­(R-C^C*)­(py)­(PPh 3 )]­PF 6 (R-C= Naph, 2A ; R = CO 2 Et, 2B ). These results were expected considering the degree of transphobia (T) of pairs of ligands in trans positions. In our previous work, we concluded that T­[C Ar /L] > T­[C*/L] and T­[C Ar /PPh 3 ] > T­[C Ar /py] > T­[C Ar /Cl], in such a way that T­[C Ar /PPh 3 ] should be the greatest one. The current experimental results indicated that, as was observed in the case of compounds 1C – 4C , the difference between T­[C Ar /PPh 3 ] and T­[C*/PPh 3 ] is big enough to direct the selective formation of trans -(C*,PPh 3 ) complexes 1A , 1B , 2A , and 2B as pure compounds.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…As inferred from these NMR data, cleavage of the bridging system rendered compounds trans -(C*,PPh 3 )­[PtCl­(R-C^C*)­(PPh 3 )] (R-C = Naph, 1A ; R = CO 2 Et, 1B ) as unique isomers and the subsequent replacement of Cl by py in the coordination environment of platinum proceeds with stereoretention, giving compounds trans -(C*,PPh 3 )­[Pt­(R-C^C*)­(py)­(PPh 3 )]­PF 6 (R-C= Naph, 2A ; R = CO 2 Et, 2B ). These results were expected considering the degree of transphobia (T) of pairs of ligands in trans positions. In our previous work, we concluded that T­[C Ar /L] > T­[C*/L] and T­[C Ar /PPh 3 ] > T­[C Ar /py] > T­[C Ar /Cl], in such a way that T­[C Ar /PPh 3 ] should be the greatest one. The current experimental results indicated that, as was observed in the case of compounds 1C – 4C , the difference between T­[C Ar /PPh 3 ] and T­[C*/PPh 3 ] is big enough to direct the selective formation of trans -(C*,PPh 3 ) complexes 1A , 1B , 2A , and 2B as pure compounds.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Investigations of the cis to trans isomerization of square-planar Pt II complexes have been carried out since the 1950s. [9,38,39] The mechanisms of isomerization in this class of complexes can be divided into two major categories. The first involves consecutive displacement, consisting of ligand dissociation resulting in the formation of a three-coordinate intermediate, whereas the second involves pseudorotation, consisting of an intramolecular rearrangement accompanied by formation of a five-coordinate intermediate.…”
Section: Mechanistic Investigationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the bond lengths at Pd vary over a very wide range (e.g. PdÐN = 2.09±2.32 A Ê ), making generalization dif®cult, and the iodo ligand may be trans to C or P. There are no examples with P trans to C for this donor atom set; consistent with the great extent of P/C`transphobia' (Vicente et al, 1997(Vicente et al, , 2002(Vicente et al, , 2006, the P-and C-atom donors are mutually cis in (I) and in the other literature examples.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 61%