2019
DOI: 10.1007/s42521-019-00004-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bitcoin and market-(in)efficiency: a systematic time series approach

Abstract: Recently, cryptocurrencies have received substantial attention by investors given their innovative features, simplicity and transparency. We here analyse the increasingly popular Bitcoin and verify pertinence of the efficient market hypothesis. Recent research suggests that Bitcoin markets, while inefficient in their early days, transitioned into efficient markets recently. We challenge this claim by proposing simple trading strategies based on moving average filters, on classic time series models as well as o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our analytical approach is centred on informational efficiency, particularly, the weak form of the efficient markets theory in finance which is grounded in the random walk hypothesis of Nobel laureates Paul Samuelson and Eugene Fama. Our study contributes to the existing literature, Kristoufek (2015a,b), Dyhberg (2016), Urquhart (2016), Bariviera et al (2017), Kurihara and Fukushima (2017), Nadarajah and Chu (2017), Chu et al (2017), Latif et al (2017), Katsiampa (2017), Peng et al (2018), Ardia (2018), Tiwari et al (2018Tiwari et al ( , 2019, , , Mensi (2018), Caporale and Zekokh (2019), Aggarwal (2019), Hu et al (2019), Jana et al, 2019, Bundi andWildi (2019), in three ways. Firstly, unlike a majority if previous studies which tend to focus on singular cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin (see Bouri et al (2019); Bouoiyour and Selmi (2016); Bariviera et al (2017); Nadarajah and Chu (2017); Troster (2018); Tiwari et al (2018); ; Alvarez-Ramirez et al (2018); Aggarwal (2019)), our study examines market efficiency in 5 cryptocurrency markets (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Our analytical approach is centred on informational efficiency, particularly, the weak form of the efficient markets theory in finance which is grounded in the random walk hypothesis of Nobel laureates Paul Samuelson and Eugene Fama. Our study contributes to the existing literature, Kristoufek (2015a,b), Dyhberg (2016), Urquhart (2016), Bariviera et al (2017), Kurihara and Fukushima (2017), Nadarajah and Chu (2017), Chu et al (2017), Latif et al (2017), Katsiampa (2017), Peng et al (2018), Ardia (2018), Tiwari et al (2018Tiwari et al ( , 2019, , , Mensi (2018), Caporale and Zekokh (2019), Aggarwal (2019), Hu et al (2019), Jana et al, 2019, Bundi andWildi (2019), in three ways. Firstly, unlike a majority if previous studies which tend to focus on singular cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin (see Bouri et al (2019); Bouoiyour and Selmi (2016); Bariviera et al (2017); Nadarajah and Chu (2017); Troster (2018); Tiwari et al (2018); ; Alvarez-Ramirez et al (2018); Aggarwal (2019)), our study examines market efficiency in 5 cryptocurrency markets (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…For example, a recent study that uses different efficiency indices argues that the bitcoin market was inefficient even until 2018 (Jiang, Nie, & Ruan, ). For a comprehensive review of the bitcoin efficiency literature to date, see Bundi and Wildi (). Note that some research on efficiency has been extended to cryptocurrencies beyond bitcoin (Brauneis & Mestel, ; Wei, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They show that simple strategies of strong arbitrage arise by trading across different Bitcoin exchanges taking advantage of a common risk factor. Bundi and Wildi (2019) analyse the Bitcoin time-series of prices and verify the pertinence of the efficient market hypothesis. They challenge recent claims that Bitcoin markets have become more efficient recently by showing or by proposing simple trading strategies based on moving average filters, on classic time series models as well as on non-linear neural nets.…”
Section: Contents Of This Special Issuementioning
confidence: 93%