2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06685
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the (in)efficiency of cryptocurrencies: have they taken daily or weekly random walks?

Abstract: The legitimacy of virtual currencies as an alternative form of monetary exchange has been the centre of an ongoing heated debated since the catastrophic global financial meltdown of 2007-2008. Our study tests the informational market efficiency of cryptomarkets by investigating the weak-form efficiency of the top-five cryptocurrencies using random walk testing procedures which are robust to asymmetries and unobserved smooth structural breaks. Moreover, our study employs two frequencies of cryptocurrency retur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2, the stock return series, R t , is considered a random walk only if ρ = 1 , whereas if |ρ| < 1 , then the series is a stationary and predictable process, which violates the weak-form EMH. We apply the Kapetanios, Shin, and Snell (KSS) nonlinear unit root test (Kapetanios et al 2003), which is more robust when there are market frictions (i.e., transaction costs) as it is proposed in Apopo and Phiri (2021) for cryptocurrency markets. We use the test implementation in the R package by Guris (2021).…”
Section: Dataset and Preprocessingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2, the stock return series, R t , is considered a random walk only if ρ = 1 , whereas if |ρ| < 1 , then the series is a stationary and predictable process, which violates the weak-form EMH. We apply the Kapetanios, Shin, and Snell (KSS) nonlinear unit root test (Kapetanios et al 2003), which is more robust when there are market frictions (i.e., transaction costs) as it is proposed in Apopo and Phiri (2021) for cryptocurrency markets. We use the test implementation in the R package by Guris (2021).…”
Section: Dataset and Preprocessingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zargar and Kumar (2019) found that higher frequencies of Bitcoin prices indicate that prices deviate from their random nature, and stated that the market is far from efficient. Apopo and Phiri (2021), in a study using data from five different cryptocurrencies for the years 2009-2019, found evidence of weak-form market efficiency in daily returns but revealed that market efficiency was not valid in weekly returns.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the most useful barometers for measurement of market liquidity of cryptocurrencies is the extent and rapidity of trading volumes [83]. In terms of efficiency, other than Bitcoin, most cryptocurrencies have been generally found to be market inefficient [51,84,85]. However, the levels of efficiency or inefficiency has varied with different time horizons with more recent timelines showing improving efficiency with increased usage of cryptocurrencies [86].…”
Section: Cryptocurrencies and Market Liquiditymentioning
confidence: 99%