2015
DOI: 10.1109/lsp.2014.2365361
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bivariate Empirical Mode Decomposition for Cognitive Radar Scene Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this work, a signal model for a rotating element is derived for an linear frequency modulation (LFM) chirp, to which a bespoke micro‐Doppler selection algorithm is designed around; this is based on direct analysis of the intrinsic mode function. The implementation of this technique is pursued for its suitability in decomposing data which is non‐stationary and potentially non‐linear [55]; hence, the suitability for application in drone classification.…”
Section: Drone Detection and Classification Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work, a signal model for a rotating element is derived for an linear frequency modulation (LFM) chirp, to which a bespoke micro‐Doppler selection algorithm is designed around; this is based on direct analysis of the intrinsic mode function. The implementation of this technique is pursued for its suitability in decomposing data which is non‐stationary and potentially non‐linear [55]; hence, the suitability for application in drone classification.…”
Section: Drone Detection and Classification Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although EMD has been widely used in various fields of engineering [20][21][22][23][24][25] due to its unique properties and preferable performance, it still suffers from the lack of firm theoretical basis and analytical interpretation of the outputs. Hence, it is extremely needed to recognize the statistical characteristics of this technique in terms of both model selection and parameter estimation for different applications in the real world.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in Bayesian target tracking [1], [2], [3], the posterior probability distribution of the target is calculated based upon a prior distribution on the states of targets and the likelihood function that characterizes the information in radar measurements. In cognitive radar research (see e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let's consider a Bayesian model that involves measured data y, unknown parameters θ, and hidden variables u. Under the Bayesian framework, we treat θ as random variables and obtain the posterior density p(θ|y) by calculating the joint posterior density p(u, θ|y) using the Bayes rule p(u, θ|y) = p(y, u, θ)/p(y) (1) Copyright (c) 2015 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%