Black‐Blood Contrast in Cardiovascular MRI

Abstract

MRI is a versatile technique that offers many different options for tissue contrast, including suppressing the blood signal, so‐called black‐blood contrast. This contrast mechanism is extremely useful to visualize the vessel wall with high conspicuity or for characterization of tissue adjacent to the blood pool. In this review we cover the physics of black‐blood contrast and different techniques to achieve blood suppression, from methods intrinsic to the imaging readout to magnetization preparation pulses that can be combined with arbitrary readouts, including flow‐dependent and flow‐independent techniques. We emphasize the technical challenges of black‐blood contrast that can depend on flow and motion conditions, additional contrast weighting mechanisms (T1, T2, etc.), magnetic properties of the tissue, and spatial coverage. Finally, we describe specific implementations of black‐blood contrast for different vascular beds. Level of Evidence 5 Technical Efficacy Stage 5

Vessel Wall MRI: clinical implementation in cerebrovascular disorders—technical aspects

“…Although both structures are fluids, different suppression techniques are required because of their different properties. Lots of different fluid-suppression techniques have been developed by MR vendors, each presenting some limitations [ 13 , 14 ].…”

A novel MRI-based data fusion methodology for efficient, personalised, compliant simulations of aortic haemodynamics

“…Cross-sectional area measurements in the segmented proximal aorta were approximately 30% smaller than the Cine-MRI areas at diastole in the same locations. This is likely due to separation-induced flow stagnation in this region of the MRA images, which can reduce image contrast and erroneously indicate the presence of wall tissue ( Henningsson et al, 2020 ). Fusing MRA and Cine-MRI, selected regions of the segmented aorta were dilated by up to 2 mm in the surface-normal direction using Simpleware ScanIP (Synopsis Inc., CA, USA) to match the diastolic (minimum) cross-sectional area measurements from Cine-MRI whilst preserving the morphology of the lumen.…”

A novel MRI-based data fusion methodology for efficient, personalised, compliant simulations of aortic haemodynamics

“…The cross-sectional area of the segmented aortic arch and proximal descending aorta was approximately 30% smaller than the equivalent 2D Cine-MRI areas. This is likely due to separation-induced flow stagnation in this region, which can reduce image contrast and erroneously indicate the presence of wall tissue (Henningsson et al, 2020). Fusing MRA and 2D Cine-MRI, selected regions of the segmented aorta were dilated by up to 2 mm in the surface-normal direction using Simpleware ScanIP (Synopsis Inc., CA, USA) to match the cross-sectional area measurements from 2D Cine-MRI whilst preserving the morphology of the lumen.…”