2012
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637x/749/1/17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Black Hole Powered Nebulae and a Case Study of the Ultraluminous X-Ray Source Ic 342 X-1

Abstract: We present new radio, optical, and X-ray observations of three Ultraluminous X-ray sources (ULXs) that are associated with large-scale nebulae. We report the discovery of a radio nebula associated with the ULX IC342 X-1 using the Very Large Array (VLA). Complementary VLA observations of the nebula around Holmberg II X-1, and high-frequency Australia Telescope Compact Array (ATCA) and Very Large Telescope (VLT) spectroscopic observations of NGC5408 X-1 are also presented. We study the morphology, ionization pro… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
109
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(124 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
15
109
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cseh et al 2012), at low flux density levels. The individual runs are in principle suitable to look for flares from HLX-1.…”
Section: Vla Observationsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Cseh et al 2012), at low flux density levels. The individual runs are in principle suitable to look for flares from HLX-1.…”
Section: Vla Observationsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…A BH mass of 5 × 10 4 M was estimated using the fundamental plane for accreting BHs, consistent with NGC 2276-3c containing an IMBH in the hard state . The detection of compact radio jets has suggested the presence of IMBHs in some other ULXs for which the fundamental plane provides a BH mass estimate in the IMBH regime (e.g., N4861-X2, N4088-X1, Mezcua & Lobanov 2011; IC342 X-1, Cseh et al 2012;N5457-X9, Mezcua et al 2013a). However, the luminosity of these ULXs being < 5 × 10 40 erg s −1 makes them also consistent with the super-Eddington accretion scenario.…”
Section: Ultraluminous X-ray Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other possible associations, like a single X-ray binary (such as CygX-3; Merloni et al 2003;Reines et al 2011) or an ultraluminous X-ray nebula (such as S26 and/or IC342X-1; Soria et al 2010;Cseh et al 2012), do not fit to the measured flux density of the persistent radio emission and/or the observed size by several orders of magnitude.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%