2019
DOI: 10.1080/00131946.2019.1630129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Black Women’s Knowing, Unruliness and the Radical Transformation of Inclusive Postsecondary Educational Spaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This has resulted in some scholars calling for a more critical approach to disability in education, beyond the current rendition of special education, which often masquerades as inclusive practices while hiding the ways that these practices "simply work to (re)secure an invisible centre from which constructions of Otherness and the designation of marginal positions becomes possible" (Graham & Slee, 2008in Loutzenheiser & Erevelles, 2019. Critical race and disability scholars have illuminated that this model of inclusion operates as a normalizing technology for the maintenance of white space by marking certain racialized bodies as unruly and disruptive (Harrington, 2019). Thus, at its core, inclusion of disability within existing educational frameworks functions as a form of neoliberal multicultural incorporation (Duggan, 2003), whereby inclusion of disability becomes about mirroring the norm and flattening difference (Loutzenheiser & Erevelles, 2019, p. 382).…”
Section: From Separation To Inclusion In Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has resulted in some scholars calling for a more critical approach to disability in education, beyond the current rendition of special education, which often masquerades as inclusive practices while hiding the ways that these practices "simply work to (re)secure an invisible centre from which constructions of Otherness and the designation of marginal positions becomes possible" (Graham & Slee, 2008in Loutzenheiser & Erevelles, 2019. Critical race and disability scholars have illuminated that this model of inclusion operates as a normalizing technology for the maintenance of white space by marking certain racialized bodies as unruly and disruptive (Harrington, 2019). Thus, at its core, inclusion of disability within existing educational frameworks functions as a form of neoliberal multicultural incorporation (Duggan, 2003), whereby inclusion of disability becomes about mirroring the norm and flattening difference (Loutzenheiser & Erevelles, 2019, p. 382).…”
Section: From Separation To Inclusion In Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Absence of inclusive policies negatively affects access to education for disabled people across all regions and income groups (UNESCO, 2021). However, truly inclusive policy development proves to be difficult; Harrington (2019) argues that occidental mainstream education often adheres to "normalizing notions of inclusion/exclusion" (p. 395) which is contingent on the premise that "being a typical student is the ideal state of being " (p. 394). With regard to disability, the focus often lies on accessibility by way of (individual) accommodation-provisions which reveals an underlying 'deficiency perspective' and requires disclosure and medical diagnosis of physical, mental, intellectual or sensory impairments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%