2016
DOI: 10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20161784
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bleached smear microscopy provides higher yield in diagnosing pulmonary tuberculosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the current study, the incidence of pulmonary TB was found to be 45%, this is comparable to study conducted by Singh et al which had an incidence of 51%, whereas few other studies done by Patel et al and Ahmed et al, the incidences were 86% and 80% respectively. 13,15,16 Amongst the cases of pulmonary TB, sputum positivity for AFB was seen in 14% of patients, whereas in study done by Patel et al, it was found to be 25.8%, and study by Ahmed et al, its 37%, the probable reason for less sputum positivity in the current study could be because of low mean CD4 count. 15,16 The situation in HIV uninfected tuberculosis patients is very different from this and indicates sputum smear is not a sensitive diagnostic tool in the presence of HIV infection.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 62%
“…In the current study, the incidence of pulmonary TB was found to be 45%, this is comparable to study conducted by Singh et al which had an incidence of 51%, whereas few other studies done by Patel et al and Ahmed et al, the incidences were 86% and 80% respectively. 13,15,16 Amongst the cases of pulmonary TB, sputum positivity for AFB was seen in 14% of patients, whereas in study done by Patel et al, it was found to be 25.8%, and study by Ahmed et al, its 37%, the probable reason for less sputum positivity in the current study could be because of low mean CD4 count. 15,16 The situation in HIV uninfected tuberculosis patients is very different from this and indicates sputum smear is not a sensitive diagnostic tool in the presence of HIV infection.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 62%