2017
DOI: 10.1515/rem-2017-0004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blended synchronous learning environment: Student perspectives

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While there were no significant statistical differences between Group 1 and Group 2, students' comments point to interesting advantages and limitations in their perception of the social presence. Several research results support the findings of this research on the social presence; for instance, Conklina et al (2017) claim that some F2F students can feel neglected when the teacher spends more time dealing with at-a-distance participants and technical issues. Other comments confirm that unclear social cues through the technological lens made it harder to interpret body language and facial expressions, which lead them to feel weaker emotional, and thus social, presence (Cunningham, 2014).…”
Section: Social Presencesupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While there were no significant statistical differences between Group 1 and Group 2, students' comments point to interesting advantages and limitations in their perception of the social presence. Several research results support the findings of this research on the social presence; for instance, Conklina et al (2017) claim that some F2F students can feel neglected when the teacher spends more time dealing with at-a-distance participants and technical issues. Other comments confirm that unclear social cues through the technological lens made it harder to interpret body language and facial expressions, which lead them to feel weaker emotional, and thus social, presence (Cunningham, 2014).…”
Section: Social Presencesupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Moreover, Cunningham (2014) and Wang et al (2017) point out that less visible body language and facial expressions through a screen can lead to misinterpretation of what participants mean, including social cues. Wang et al (2017) and Conklina, Oyarzun, and Barreto (2017) note that the type of technology used can either foster or hinder emotional presence, which is said to increase the social presence among participants. In line with the theoretical stance of social constructivism, meaningful peer interaction and social presence lead to significant learning outcomes (Szeto & Cheng, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A program and course are structured to enhance positive interaction between student, teacher and peers; however some problems do occur during online learning (Dabbagh, Fake, & Zhang, 2019). Student satisfaction affected by instructor's interaction within online or face to face sessions (Conklina, Oyarzun, & Barreto, 2017). According to Lowe & Mestel (2016), online tutorial provide convenience platform to the student yet face to face session is better to practice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Students also need additional arrangement and materials in order to facilitate them to understand thus score subjects (Said & Syarif, 2016). A study conducted by Conklina et al (2017) observed the environment and interaction between student and instructor were rated low during online learning. Lowe & Mestel (2016) also reported interaction between student and teacher are low for online tutorial learning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation