2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2021.108588
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blind deconvolution criterion based on Fourier–Bessel series expansion for rolling element bearing diagnostics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this scenario, several studies have proposed effective methods to enhance and extract bearing fault features, such as the Kurtogra method [4,5], empirical modal decomposition [6,7], variational modal decomposition [8], wavelet transform [9,10], sparse representation [11][12][13], and blind deconvolution, etc. Blind deconvolution is frequently applied to the fault detection of bearings because of its ability to recover weak periodic pulses from strong background noise signals [14,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this scenario, several studies have proposed effective methods to enhance and extract bearing fault features, such as the Kurtogra method [4,5], empirical modal decomposition [6,7], variational modal decomposition [8], wavelet transform [9,10], sparse representation [11][12][13], and blind deconvolution, etc. Blind deconvolution is frequently applied to the fault detection of bearings because of its ability to recover weak periodic pulses from strong background noise signals [14,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The wavelet transform (WT) method uses the wavelet base to decompose time signals. However, with a wavelet base, WT has no self-adaptability at different scales, and empirical mode decomposition (EMD) can separate mixed signals into several intrinsic mode function (IMF) components and identify feature signals [ 13 , 14 ]. However, there are still problems with this method [ 15 , 16 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there are still problems with this method [ 15 , 16 ]. Though the local mean decomposition (LMD) method can apply the local average and envelope estimation functions to signals, it is limited by the endpoint effect [ 13 , 17 ]. A filtering method can sometimes eliminate noises that are not correlated with the feature leak signals and improve localization accuracy; however, these methods still have intrinsic drawbacks and external factors that limit their use in pipelines.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the overwhelming majority of studies in the field of bearing diagnostics focus on noise reduction and accurate extraction of fault signatures. A variety of effective methods have emerged, such as mode decomposition methods, 46 spectral kurtosis methods, 710 wavelet analysis methods, 1113 blind filter methods, 14,15 and stochastic resonance methods. 1618…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the overwhelming majority of studies in the field of bearing diagnostics focus on noise reduction and accurate extraction of fault signatures. A variety of effective methods have emerged, such as mode decomposition methods, [4][5][6] spectral kurtosis methods, [7][8][9][10] wavelet analysis methods, [11][12][13] blind filter methods, 14,15 and stochastic resonance methods. [16][17][18] Among these methods, wavelet analysis is undoubtedly one of the most popular methods, as it is a new time-frequency analysis method with multi-resolution analysis performance which is ideally suitable for characterizing the transient signatures of bearing damages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%