2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.image.2015.10.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blind image quality assessment by relative gradient statistics and adaboosting neural network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
149
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 230 publications
(149 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
149
0
Order By: Relevance
“…NR Image/Video Quality Assessment (IQA/VQA) generally rely on feature extracting and feature learning based methods. A good overview of such techniques can be found in [34,35].…”
Section: A Visual Quality Evaluation Methods For Telemedicine Applicatmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…NR Image/Video Quality Assessment (IQA/VQA) generally rely on feature extracting and feature learning based methods. A good overview of such techniques can be found in [34,35].…”
Section: A Visual Quality Evaluation Methods For Telemedicine Applicatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the correlation with subjective results is reasonable, this is not high enough for medical images. All NR and RR techniques reported in the literature vary in complexity and processing requirements [34,35] and may not particularly answer the needs in a telemedicine application.…”
Section: A Visual Quality Evaluation Methods For Telemedicine Applicatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This measure discriminates blur and Gaussian noise. In [9], authors presented a new model, called Oriented Gradients Image Quality Assessment (OG-IQA), showing highly competitive image quality prediction performance as compared with other quality measures. The LIVE image database [5] was used for performance evaluation of the model.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…L L L Evaluated level (9) where L2 is the evaluated level for parameter 2, L10 for parameter 10, and L18 for parameter 18. Additionally, we tested the performance of the proposed quality measure using Pearson's and Spearman's correlation between DMOS (Difference MOS) LIVE dataset scores for noise degradation, MOS VCL@FER dataset scores for blur degradation and results of the proposed measure.…”
Section: Level Of Blurriness and Gaussian Noisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…All features considered in this paper are extracted from nine commonly used learningbased NR- [22]. A reason of the choice of those trial algorithms is motivated by the fact that the code of all of them is publicly available.…”
Section: Selected Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%