2022
DOI: 10.1093/imaiai/iaac015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blind inverse problems with isolated spikes

Abstract: Assume that an unknown integral operator living in some known subspace is observed indirectly, by evaluating its action on a discrete measure containing a few isolated Dirac masses at an unknown location. Is this information enough to recover the impulse response location and the operator with a sub-pixel accuracy? We study this question and bring to light key geometrical quantities for exact and stable recovery. We also propose an in-depth study of the presence of additive white Gaussian noise. We illustrate … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We place ourselves in the case of the recovery of one spike (note that this case is often very informative for the study of limits of super-resolution algorithms [19,38]). Results on basins of attractions show that if the descent is initialized sufficiently close to the observed spike, then under the RIP condition there will be convergence to the desired position (at a linear rate).…”
Section: Presentation Of the Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We place ourselves in the case of the recovery of one spike (note that this case is often very informative for the study of limits of super-resolution algorithms [19,38]). Results on basins of attractions show that if the descent is initialized sufficiently close to the observed spike, then under the RIP condition there will be convergence to the desired position (at a linear rate).…”
Section: Presentation Of the Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The condition (Cond 1 ) is strongly connected to the Cramér-Rao lower-bound. Using assumptions (10) and (11), we obtain…”
Section: Relationship To Cramér-raomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…□ Let us assume that R > RL 2 . Without loss of generality, we can also assume that R µ ⩽ RL 2 , since the inequalities in (11) are still valid when replacing B Rµ by B R ′ with R ′ ⩽ R µ . In this setting, the success condition…”
Section: Lemma D1 (Expectation and Tail Bounds For The Supremum)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation