1986
DOI: 10.1016/0091-6749(86)90324-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blinded comparison of maxillary sinus radiography and ultrasound for diagnosis of sinusitis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
2

Year Published

1988
1988
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
20
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Unfortunately, several studies comparing ultrasonography with radiographic techniques (as the gold standard) suggest that the sensitivity and specificity of ultrasonography is poor, ranging from 39% to 61% and 42% to 53%, respectively. [81][82][83][84] Another limitation is that ultrasonography can only be used to evaluate the frontal and maxillary sinuses. 85 Despite these issues, ultrasonography might have some utility as a sinus diagnostic screen in pregnant women to avoid risks of ionizing radiation.…”
Section: Summary Statementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, several studies comparing ultrasonography with radiographic techniques (as the gold standard) suggest that the sensitivity and specificity of ultrasonography is poor, ranging from 39% to 61% and 42% to 53%, respectively. [81][82][83][84] Another limitation is that ultrasonography can only be used to evaluate the frontal and maxillary sinuses. 85 Despite these issues, ultrasonography might have some utility as a sinus diagnostic screen in pregnant women to avoid risks of ionizing radiation.…”
Section: Summary Statementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In skilful hands, ultrasound is both high sensitive and speci c in diagnosing ACAMS (6). On the other hand, if the physician is not properly educated and practiced in the use of ultrasound, the method is as good as a guess (7,8). Many symptoms and signs of ACAMS, e.g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the expense of sinus x rays and the exposure to nonionizing radiation, many studies have examined the usefulness of ultrasound to diagnose sinusitis. While some investigators have found excellent correlation between maxillary ultrasound and radiographic findings, especially in sinuses that are normal or contain airfluid levels [138,139], others have determined that it is not more and may even be less accurate than x rays [140,141]. Another limitation of ultrasound examination of the sinuses is that mucosal abnormalities (e.g., thickening, polyps, and cysts) are poorly differentiated [139,142].…”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 98%