Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Emerging Networking EXperiments and Technologies 2018
DOI: 10.1145/3281411.3281428
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

BLoc

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The concern is however the applicability of such a solution since collecting CSI requires special Wi‐Fi chip or SDR, which raises the bar for crowd‐sensing. But since unlabeled data can be used, the bar is still lower than those recent analytical‐based methods 37–45 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The concern is however the applicability of such a solution since collecting CSI requires special Wi‐Fi chip or SDR, which raises the bar for crowd‐sensing. But since unlabeled data can be used, the bar is still lower than those recent analytical‐based methods 37–45 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…These experiments demonstrate the potential for automated collection, for example, by pulling an electromagnet behind a tractor in agricultural deployments. Our onboard radio could also be used for localization and presents opportunities to use recent advances in the sensor networking communities (45,46). An alternative method that is more attractive for remote and difficult terrain would be to incorporate biodegradable materials in the design of our microfliers (47).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, we chose K = 7 as a trade-off between accuracy and complexity of the setup. The selected unique combinations using K = 7 and R = 3 from all 7 anchors yielded anchor combinations: [1,3,5], [2,4,6], [3,5,7], [4,6,1], [5,7,2], [6, 1, 3], [7,2,4].…”
Section: A Proposed Anchor-subset Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typically, these systems rely on received signal strength indicators (RSSIs) to estimate the distance, which results in a 2 − 3 m error (the "positioning accuracy") due to the presence of non-line-of-sight (NLOS) and multi-path fading effects [2]. More recently, phase-based receivers have been proposed to offer higher accuracy, but these solutions require more expensive hardware and antenna systems [3]. Ultra Wideband (UWB) positioning systems are gaining a lot of attention by the research community and are appearing in consumer products e.g., Apple and Samsung mobile phones.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%