2008 Eighth IEEE International Conference on Data Mining 2008
DOI: 10.1109/icdm.2008.77
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Block-Iterative Algorithms for Non-negative Matrix Approximation

Abstract: In this paper we present new algorithms for non-negative matrix approximation (NMA), commonly known as the NMF problem. Our methods improve upon the well-known methods of Lee & Seung [12] for both the Frobenius norm as well the Kullback-Leibler divergence versions of the problem. For the latter problem, our results are especially interesting because it seems to have witnessed much lesser algorithmic progress as compared to the Frobenius norm NMA problem. Our algorithms are based on a particular block-iterativ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 31 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Depending on the probabilistic model of the underlying data, NMF can be formulated with various divergences. Formulations and algorithms based on Kullback-Leibler divergence [67,79], Bregman divergence [24,68], Itakura-Saito divergence [29], and Alpha and Beta divergences [21,22] have been developed. For discussion on nonnegative rank as well as the geometric interpretation of NMF, see Lin and Chu [72], Gillis [34], and Donoho and Stodden [27].…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depending on the probabilistic model of the underlying data, NMF can be formulated with various divergences. Formulations and algorithms based on Kullback-Leibler divergence [67,79], Bregman divergence [24,68], Itakura-Saito divergence [29], and Alpha and Beta divergences [21,22] have been developed. For discussion on nonnegative rank as well as the geometric interpretation of NMF, see Lin and Chu [72], Gillis [34], and Donoho and Stodden [27].…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%