SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2019 2019
DOI: 10.1190/segam2019-3216690.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Block-Krylov methods for multi-dimensional deconvolution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

3
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI 10.1109/TGRS.2022.3179626, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 3 [16] or iterative Block-Krylov solvers [26]. Alternatively, a time-domain formulation can be written as [20]:…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI 10.1109/TGRS.2022.3179626, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 3 [16] or iterative Block-Krylov solvers [26]. Alternatively, a time-domain formulation can be written as [20]:…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This expression can be physically interpreted as follows: the point spread function (PSF), Γ Γ Γ = ( P+ ) H P+ , acts as a blurring operator on the sought after solution, resulting in a band-limited cross-correlation function (CCF), C = ( P+ ) H P− . Inversion of the normal equations, C = Γ Γ Γ Ĝp , is performed for every frequency independently; this can be accomplished by means of either direct or block Krylov methods (Luiken et al, 2019).…”
Section: Frequency Domain Mddmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inversion of the normal equations, C = ΓG, in the frequency domain is commonly done for each frequency slice individually. Since the stabilized point spread function is inverted per frequency component, the required memory is such that, operator and data matrices of size (n r × n s ) can be explicitly defined, therefore, this strategy is computationally feasible and in many cases direct or block Krylov methods can be used [48,49]. A major drawback in solving (8) lies in the difficulty of selecting an optimal regularization parameter, in fact, many of the parameter selection methods rely on solving the system multiples times and select λ based on an additional minimization problem [50].…”
Section: Frequency Domain Mdd-regularized Least Squaresmentioning
confidence: 99%