2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.laa.2018.10.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Block minimal bases ℓ-ifications of matrix polynomials

Abstract: The standard way of solving a polynomial eigenvalue problem associated with a matrix polynomial starts by embedding the matrix coefficients of the polynomial into a matrix pencil, known as a strong linearization. This process transforms the problem into an equivalent generalized eigenvalue problem. However, there are some situations in which is more convenient to replace linearizations by other low degree matrix polynomials. This has motivated the idea of a strong ℓ-ification of a matrix polynomial, which is a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…But, first, we notice that if we do not impose the M Astructure on the pencil M (λ), it is possible to prove that the polynomial equation (4.4) is always consistent, with infinitely many solutions, as a consequence of the properties of the minimal basis N (λ). This result will be proved in [27], in a much more general setting.…”
Section: Strong Block Minimal Bases Pencils and Mmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…But, first, we notice that if we do not impose the M Astructure on the pencil M (λ), it is possible to prove that the polynomial equation (4.4) is always consistent, with infinitely many solutions, as a consequence of the properties of the minimal basis N (λ). This result will be proved in [27], in a much more general setting.…”
Section: Strong Block Minimal Bases Pencils and Mmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…In this paper it is enough to know that an ℓ-ification of a polynomial matrix P (λ) is another polynomial matrix of degree ℓ that has the same (finite and infinite) elementary divisors, the same number of left, and the same number of right minimal indices as P (λ). The results in [11] pose naturally the question whether or not the backward error analysis for block Kronecker linearizations in [10,Section 6] can be extended to the classes of ℓ-ifications introduced in [11]. This seems to be a hard problem whose potential solution will be related for sure to the results in this paper.…”
Section: Applications To Backward Error Analysesmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…A second application is related to the fact that the SBMB and block Kronecker linearizations of polynomial matrices recently introduced in [10] can be extended to SBMB and block Kronecker ℓ-ifications of polynomial matrices [11], which are constructed by using polynomial matrices with full-Sylvester-rank of degree ℓ and whose right minimal indices are all equal. The reader is referred to [6,9] for formal definitions of the concept of an ℓ-ification of a polynomial matrix.…”
Section: Applications To Backward Error Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed there is much current research into what is called " -ification," i.e. reduction of a matrix polynomial of degree m to a (larger) matrix polynomial of degree at most (having degree at most is also called "having grade ") [1]. But here we restrict ourselves to the case = 1.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%