2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2006.00174.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blockade of Cue‐induced Brain Activation of Abstinent Alcoholics by a Single Administration of Amisulpride as Measured With fMRI

Abstract: Amisulpride medication was associated with reduced cue-induced activation of the thalamus, a brain region closely connected with frontostriatal circuits that regulate behavior and may influence relapse risk.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
52
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
3
52
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, a priori ROI analyses indicated that gustatory alcohol cues elicited activation in many of the structures that have been previously implicated in the development and expression of craving for a variety of drugs of abuse including the VTA/SN (Kareken et al, 2004), OFC (Hermann et al, 2006;Myrick et al, 2004), and medial PFC (Kalivas and Volkow, 2005;Myrick et al, 2004;Park et al, in press). Interestingly, we did not observe differential activity in the VS corresponding to alcohol vs control cues as previously reported by other groups (eg Kareken et al, 2004); instead, we found increased DS/caudate activity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In the present study, a priori ROI analyses indicated that gustatory alcohol cues elicited activation in many of the structures that have been previously implicated in the development and expression of craving for a variety of drugs of abuse including the VTA/SN (Kareken et al, 2004), OFC (Hermann et al, 2006;Myrick et al, 2004), and medial PFC (Kalivas and Volkow, 2005;Myrick et al, 2004;Park et al, in press). Interestingly, we did not observe differential activity in the VS corresponding to alcohol vs control cues as previously reported by other groups (eg Kareken et al, 2004); instead, we found increased DS/caudate activity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This activation enhances neural excitability and excitatory synaptic activity within dHipp (Hopkins and Johnston, 1984;Pedarzani and Storm, 1993) and PL-mPFC (Ji et al, 2008;Otis et al, 2013). Thus, these structures become active following drug-associated cue exposure (Hearing et al, 2010;Hermann et al, 2006;Miller and Marshall, 2004;Neiswander et al, 2000), leading to memory retrieval. Inhibiting dHipp or PL-mPFC activation by blocking b-AR activity likely renders cocaine-conditioned cues less salient, preventing drug-associated memory retrieval.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, norepinephrine (NE) and b-AR activation within dHipp are critical for contextual fear memory retrieval, but not for fear expression alone (Murchison et al, 2004). The dHipp is activated by drug-associated cue exposure in both rodents (Neisewander et al, 2000;Hearing et al, 2010) and humans (Hermann et al, 2006), and dHipp inactivation prevents context-driven drug seeking and reinstatement (Fuchs et al, 2005;Meyers et al, 2006). Despite evidence that dHipp is involved in memory retrieval and reinstatement, it remains unclear whether dHipp b-AR activation is required for drug-associated memory retrieval and subsequent druginduced reinstatement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other reward-related areas, including the insula (29)(30)(31) and cingulate gyrus (8,14,15,29,(32)(33)(34)(35)(36), show increased activity with the presentation of drug-related stimuli. Presentation of these stimuli is also associated with increased activity in brain structures that underlie reward and emotion regulation, such as the thalamus (9,30,(37)(38)(39)(40) and amygdala (32,39).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%