2020
DOI: 10.1080/17579961.2020.1727094
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blockchain, GDPR, and fantasies of data sovereignty

Abstract: Like the European Union's General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), the broader, mainstream emergence of blockchain technology in the present moment of, what I call, data dysphoria is no accident. It is in part reaction to data dysphoria, and in part exploitation of it, a duality underpinned by the tantalizing promise of the prosumer 'taking control' of their data and establishing sovereignty over it. Blockchain and GDPR alike aim to resolve 'problem'/'solution' matrices with deep roots in a wide variety of g… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although it is too simplistic to consider the institutional future of the blockchain as a battle between law (the state) and code (blockchain-cryptographic algorithms), the conflict of institutional logics that underlie the blockchain institutions is already beginning to appear in concrete forms. A good example is the contradiction between declared EU norms of the right to the erasure of personal data and the technical impossibility of erasure in blockchain systems (Herian, 2018). In addition to the technological immutability of distributed ledgers, the institutional logic of the blockchain is explicitly aimed at preventing erasure in order to avoid the influence of third parties.…”
Section: Blockchain As An Institutional Assemblagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although it is too simplistic to consider the institutional future of the blockchain as a battle between law (the state) and code (blockchain-cryptographic algorithms), the conflict of institutional logics that underlie the blockchain institutions is already beginning to appear in concrete forms. A good example is the contradiction between declared EU norms of the right to the erasure of personal data and the technical impossibility of erasure in blockchain systems (Herian, 2018). In addition to the technological immutability of distributed ledgers, the institutional logic of the blockchain is explicitly aimed at preventing erasure in order to avoid the influence of third parties.…”
Section: Blockchain As An Institutional Assemblagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Immutability is a key factor of blockchain technology in that this platform enables, via time stamp verification and some sort of consensus verification, the locking in of information, uploaded via blocks, into the existing blockchain data structure (Carlozo, 2017a) Additionally, once this information has been verified and uploaded onto the blockchain, it cannot be altered unless the initial data is reversed, and re-uploaded in a fresh block of information. One consideration that must be taken into account, even as audit and attestation is altered by such immutability, is the fact that this very immutability may run afoul of regulation (Herian, 2018). Another, and arguably the most important factor that sets blockchain aside from other networking and database tools, is the fact that it is a decentralized data platform.…”
Section: Blockchainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the right of the information subject to decide on its own regarding the disclosure and use of personal information." In this regard, blockchain and privacy laws share their philosophy [18][19][20][21][22].…”
Section: Analysis Of the Flow Of Personal Information Related Tomentioning
confidence: 99%